LETTER: Naledi Pandor supports Russian barbarity in Ukraine
SA’s ‘mediation in global conflicts’ has hardly been evident in DRC, Zimbabwe, Darfur and other strife-torn regions around the world
13 April 2022 - 17:03
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
SA’s disgraceful abstention during the UN General Assembly vote to suspend Russia from the UN Human Rights Council lays bare the moral bankruptcy and depths to which international relations minister Naledi Pandor and the ANC government have sunk. In the face of glaring evidence of Russian barbarity during its aggressive invasion of Ukraine, Pandor — addressing the heads of mission conference — unashamedly stated that SA “seeks to mediate in global conflicts”.
See just how her department of international relations and co-operation intervened and tried to mediate in the Syrian civil war, when Russian fighter jets were bombing schools and hospitals in Aleppo, causing the death of thousands of children. See how Pandor tried to mediate when those same Russian aircraft were bombing Idlib and Homs.
But hold on, this was Russian aggression and Russian support to an Assad regime that was clearly culpable for the slaughter of upwards of half-a-million innocent people, of more than 6-million displaced Syrians. Why in heaven’s name would SA interfere given Pandor’s claim of “mediating in global conflicts'”? Her ambassador remained comfortably ensconced in his embassy in Damascus, giving the green light to Russia and Syria to continue to this day with their gruesome work, just as she is now supporting Russian barbarity in Ukraine.
SA’s “mediation in global conflicts” has hardly been evident in Democratic Republic of Congo, Zimbabwe, Darfur and other strife-torn regions around the world. Talk is cheap, dear foreign minister. See just how effective her “mediation” has been when Israel is involved — Pandor needs to check the meaning of “mediation”, “conciliation”, “negotiation”, and “facilitation”.
Allan Wolman Tel Aviv, Israel
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: Naledi Pandor supports Russian barbarity in Ukraine
SA’s ‘mediation in global conflicts’ has hardly been evident in DRC, Zimbabwe, Darfur and other strife-torn regions around the world
SA’s disgraceful abstention during the UN General Assembly vote to suspend Russia from the UN Human Rights Council lays bare the moral bankruptcy and depths to which international relations minister Naledi Pandor and the ANC government have sunk. In the face of glaring evidence of Russian barbarity during its aggressive invasion of Ukraine, Pandor — addressing the heads of mission conference — unashamedly stated that SA “seeks to mediate in global conflicts”.
See just how her department of international relations and co-operation intervened and tried to mediate in the Syrian civil war, when Russian fighter jets were bombing schools and hospitals in Aleppo, causing the death of thousands of children. See how Pandor tried to mediate when those same Russian aircraft were bombing Idlib and Homs.
But hold on, this was Russian aggression and Russian support to an Assad regime that was clearly culpable for the slaughter of upwards of half-a-million innocent people, of more than 6-million displaced Syrians. Why in heaven’s name would SA interfere given Pandor’s claim of “mediating in global conflicts'”? Her ambassador remained comfortably ensconced in his embassy in Damascus, giving the green light to Russia and Syria to continue to this day with their gruesome work, just as she is now supporting Russian barbarity in Ukraine.
SA’s “mediation in global conflicts” has hardly been evident in Democratic Republic of Congo, Zimbabwe, Darfur and other strife-torn regions around the world. Talk is cheap, dear foreign minister. See just how effective her “mediation” has been when Israel is involved — Pandor needs to check the meaning of “mediation”, “conciliation”, “negotiation”, and “facilitation”.
Allan Wolman
Tel Aviv, Israel
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
LETTER: ANC’s real stance on Israel revealed
Africa’s mixed stance on UN action on Russia explained
LETTER: Israel-Russia comparison is sickening
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
LETTER: No normal diplomacy for abnormal aggressors
Ramaphosa and Zelensky edge towards phone call as SA appears to soften
Pandor defends SA’s abstention, saying UN ousting Russia from human rights ...
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.