The National Health Insurance monopoly will result in more corruption and is likely to drive away healthcare professionals
07 April 2022 - 18:37
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Speaking at the Pharmacy Show on April 6, the department of health deputy director-general in charge of National Health Insurance (NHI), Dr Nicholas Crisp, said the department would not back down from implementing the proposed national scheme. He added: “We want everybody in SA to get a good health system.”
If it is true that the department, and Dr Crisp, want South Africans to have access to quality healthcare, it is unlikely that the NHI is the best path to attain such an outcome. It will in effect monopolise the management of all healthcare, private and public, in the hands of the state — an incapable state at that.
The inefficiencies, problems and wastage in public sector facilities have been well documented. There is little reason to believe that simply giving the state more resources and control would resolve these deep structural problems.
That there are problems in the private sector cannot be denied; but again, granting the state access to a huge pot, and increasing bureaucratic and political power over healthcare facilities and personnel, is by no means the best path to increase access and quality of care. The state could do much better work by implementing the recommendations of the Health Market Inquiry.
Were the government to obtain the fiscal muscle necessary to implement a scheme of the size of the NHI, it should know that introducing the system will increase the possibility of cronyism and other forms of corruption. There will be fierce competition between those in government and the private sector to have the most access to the pot of gold. Indeed, the NHI will likely make state capture look paltry by comparison.
The NHI is likely to drive healthcare professionals out of the country and steadily lower the quality of care in the private sector. In the end, the wealthiest of politicians and private citizens will still be able to go overseas for quality healthcare; the vast majority of South Africans will have no option but to “choose” between ever worsening facilities and fewer resources.
Chris Hattingh Institute of Race Relations
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: NHI a recipe for disaster
The National Health Insurance monopoly will result in more corruption and is likely to drive away healthcare professionals
Speaking at the Pharmacy Show on April 6, the department of health deputy director-general in charge of National Health Insurance (NHI), Dr Nicholas Crisp, said the department would not back down from implementing the proposed national scheme. He added: “We want everybody in SA to get a good health system.”
If it is true that the department, and Dr Crisp, want South Africans to have access to quality healthcare, it is unlikely that the NHI is the best path to attain such an outcome. It will in effect monopolise the management of all healthcare, private and public, in the hands of the state — an incapable state at that.
The inefficiencies, problems and wastage in public sector facilities have been well documented. There is little reason to believe that simply giving the state more resources and control would resolve these deep structural problems.
That there are problems in the private sector cannot be denied; but again, granting the state access to a huge pot, and increasing bureaucratic and political power over healthcare facilities and personnel, is by no means the best path to increase access and quality of care. The state could do much better work by implementing the recommendations of the Health Market Inquiry.
Were the government to obtain the fiscal muscle necessary to implement a scheme of the size of the NHI, it should know that introducing the system will increase the possibility of cronyism and other forms of corruption. There will be fierce competition between those in government and the private sector to have the most access to the pot of gold. Indeed, the NHI will likely make state capture look paltry by comparison.
The NHI is likely to drive healthcare professionals out of the country and steadily lower the quality of care in the private sector. In the end, the wealthiest of politicians and private citizens will still be able to go overseas for quality healthcare; the vast majority of South Africans will have no option but to “choose” between ever worsening facilities and fewer resources.
Chris Hattingh
Institute of Race Relations
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Health department defends governance plan for NHI fund
Medical schemes regulator dismays sector with another reprieve for health insurers
HEALTH: Squeeze on nurses, doctors
Cash-strapped health watchdog says it needs more funds to do its job
SA’s health system is on its knees: the budget offers no relief
Treasury gives scathing review of stagnant NHI
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
AHMED BANDERKER: What the budget’s fine print reveals about government’s health ...
GAIL DAUS-VAN WYK: Health and the NHI
JOHN STUART: Why the policy environment matters for SA
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.