LETTER: Vumacam don’t use facial recognition technology
Gugu Lourie gets his facts wrong on monitoring and data privacy
06 April 2022 - 15:37
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
We note with concern factual inaccuracies in Gugu Lourie’s article (“Data privacy increasingly a vital issue, and needs to be bolstered”, March 30). The lack of research given information freely available in the public domain has resulted in the public being misinformed about our cameras and technology.
Lourie inaccurately stated that: “The company has not solicited the consent of communities to have their facial recognition data saved on its servers. Residents are not complaining because the company has promised to use the cameras to keep their areas safe. Even children are not saved from having their data collected and stored somewhere, probably at the risk of abuse.”
Vumacam does not use, and has not ever used, facial recognition technology. We do not believe it is appropriate to do so due to the lack of regulation of its use and the ethical impact that arises from this technology in its current form.
Vumacam does not save “facial recognition data” on its servers.
Vumacam does not store children’s data, and certainly does not abuse it.
Vumacam operates two types of cameras: licence plate recognition cameras that flag vehicles placed on “vehicles of interest” databases; and cameras that use algorithms to detect unusual activity, items or behaviour such as guns, knives, an attack or an accident. Monitoring screens do not show a constant feed. Screens only become active if and when there is an alert. Footage is stored for regulated periods with the highest levels of security. Rigorous internal audit processes ensure protection against system abuse.
We are working closely with the information regulator to ensure the highest standards of data privacy for CCTV operations in SA. This is something we believe is just as important as our crime-fighting technology. Lourie’s fearmongering erodes trust in the technology that supports law enforcement and private security companies to help keep South Africans safe.
We are happy to show anyone how our systems work, and their measurable success in supporting law enforcement and private security to apprehend criminals. While we acknowledge that individuals should at all times keep their personal data secure, our operations are certainly not an example of such a threat.
Ricky Croock CEO, Vumacam
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: Vumacam don’t use facial recognition technology
Gugu Lourie gets his facts wrong on monitoring and data privacy
We note with concern factual inaccuracies in Gugu Lourie’s article (“Data privacy increasingly a vital issue, and needs to be bolstered”, March 30). The lack of research given information freely available in the public domain has resulted in the public being misinformed about our cameras and technology.
Lourie inaccurately stated that: “The company has not solicited the consent of communities to have their facial recognition data saved on its servers. Residents are not complaining because the company has promised to use the cameras to keep their areas safe. Even children are not saved from having their data collected and stored somewhere, probably at the risk of abuse.”
Vumacam operates two types of cameras: licence plate recognition cameras that flag vehicles placed on “vehicles of interest” databases; and cameras that use algorithms to detect unusual activity, items or behaviour such as guns, knives, an attack or an accident. Monitoring screens do not show a constant feed. Screens only become active if and when there is an alert. Footage is stored for regulated periods with the highest levels of security. Rigorous internal audit processes ensure protection against system abuse.
We are working closely with the information regulator to ensure the highest standards of data privacy for CCTV operations in SA. This is something we believe is just as important as our crime-fighting technology. Lourie’s fearmongering erodes trust in the technology that supports law enforcement and private security companies to help keep South Africans safe.
We are happy to show anyone how our systems work, and their measurable success in supporting law enforcement and private security to apprehend criminals. While we acknowledge that individuals should at all times keep their personal data secure, our operations are certainly not an example of such a threat.
Ricky Croock
CEO, Vumacam
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
GUGU LOURIE: Data privacy increasingly a vital issue, and needs to be bolstered
TransUnion ordered to inform those whose information was compromised in hack
KATE THOMPSON DAVY: TransUnion hack is a real test for privacy law and another headache for credit consumers
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
JOHAN STEYN: It’s possible for clients to love your contact centre
Gender pay gaps narrow at most UK banks
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.