Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Larry Fink’s annual letter to CEOs includes admirable language on the topic, such as“a company must create value for and be valued by its full range of stakeholders to deliver long-term value”.
Yet how does he propose this is achieved? Here is where things start to get complicated. On business contributions to net-zero he states“it will not happen overnight” but “pass through shades of brown to shades of green”. This fails to reflect the pressingurgency of the climate crisis.
The priority for many investors is still enterprise value creation, notsustainability. Yet reporting guidance that is focused only on the financial consequences of climate impacts is short-sighted. Companies must also be accountable for the impacts they have on the environment and the socioeconomic cohesion of society.
We support Fink’s drive towards a stakeholder-centric economic model. But without considering the information needs of all stakeholders companies are faced with a credibility issue. Endorsing broad sustainability reporting, as supported by theGlobal Reporting Initiative Standards, would reflect BlackRock’s stated backing for stakeholder capitalism and be appreciated by the thousands of companies that already use our standards.
Preserving value and managing impacts is not and should not be mutually exclusive. Sustainability reporting that informs the full spectrum of stakeholders is not only desirable, it’s good for business.In Fink's words, “this won’t happen overnight”, but the starting point for companies is not a murky shade. It’s about committingnowto comprehensive corporate reporting of both financial and sustainability impacts, and that’s as clear as black and white.
Eelco van der Enden Global Reporting Initiative, Amsterdam
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: Fink fails to reflect climate urgency
As Business Day reported in January, the leader of the world’s largest asset manager has pressed for companies to be more accountable for their impacts (“BlackRock’s Fink defends push to focus on more than profits”, January 18).
Larry Fink’s annual letter to CEOs includes admirable language on the topic, such as “a company must create value for and be valued by its full range of stakeholders to deliver long-term value”.
Yet how does he propose this is achieved? Here is where things start to get complicated. On business contributions to net-zero he states “it will not happen overnight” but “pass through shades of brown to shades of green”. This fails to reflect the pressing urgency of the climate crisis.
The priority for many investors is still enterprise value creation, not sustainability. Yet reporting guidance that is focused only on the financial consequences of climate impacts is short-sighted. Companies must also be accountable for the impacts they have on the environment and the socioeconomic cohesion of society.
We support Fink’s drive towards a stakeholder-centric economic model. But without considering the information needs of all stakeholders companies are faced with a credibility issue. Endorsing broad sustainability reporting, as supported by the Global Reporting Initiative Standards, would reflect BlackRock’s stated backing for stakeholder capitalism and be appreciated by the thousands of companies that already use our standards.
Preserving value and managing impacts is not and should not be mutually exclusive. Sustainability reporting that informs the full spectrum of stakeholders is not only desirable, it’s good for business. In Fink's words, “this won’t happen overnight”, but the starting point for companies is not a murky shade. It’s about committing now to comprehensive corporate reporting of both financial and sustainability impacts, and that’s as clear as black and white.
Eelco van der Enden
Global Reporting Initiative, Amsterdam
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
ANN CROTTY: So much for shareholder democracy
BlackRock’s Fink defends push to focus on more than profits
BlackRock raises $673m for climate-focused fund
PAUL J DAVIES: How to get CEOs involved in cutting emissions
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
DEON GOUWS: Know your ESG investing
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.