LETTER: Reduction in pupil-to-teacher ratio should be central goal
Education fix begins with focusing on reducing the pupil-to-teacher ratio from its current greater than 40:1 ratio to less than 30:1
17 January 2022 - 15:25
byMark Townsend
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
The annual criticism of the matric results has been foreshadowed with commentary on the 30% pass mark metric. While the abysmal pass rate and dropout rate show the depth of the crisis within our public education system, the fix begins with focusing on reducing the pupil-to-teacher ratio from its current greater than 40:1 ratio to less than 30:1.
First, the design assumption for a classroom, certainly those inherited from the old provincial education departments, is 30 children and one teacher. Overcrowded classrooms are just not a conducive learning environment. Reducing the pupil-to-teacher ratio allows for the improvement of the quality of outcomes by giving teachers more time and opportunity to properly assess and support each child in their charge. We are currently asking our educators to work continuously at 150%, it is just not a sustainable situation.
The reduction of the pupil-to-teacher ratio should thus be a central policy goal of government. The achievement of this policy goal will drive the construction of more schools in the right locations, and the recruitment and training of more teachers. The training of additional staff should be an obvious policy anyway. But there is no sign of new teaching training colleges being built and the capacity to train teachers being increased.
Certainly, there are other challenges to be addressed within our education system. Both teachers and schoolchildren need more support, but I can think of no better starting point and no policy with a bigger positive impact than the pursuit of a reduction in the pupil-to-teacher ratio.
Mark Townsend
Via email
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: Reduction in pupil-to-teacher ratio should be central goal
Education fix begins with focusing on reducing the pupil-to-teacher ratio from its current greater than 40:1 ratio to less than 30:1
The annual criticism of the matric results has been foreshadowed with commentary on the 30% pass mark metric. While the abysmal pass rate and dropout rate show the depth of the crisis within our public education system, the fix begins with focusing on reducing the pupil-to-teacher ratio from its current greater than 40:1 ratio to less than 30:1.
First, the design assumption for a classroom, certainly those inherited from the old provincial education departments, is 30 children and one teacher. Overcrowded classrooms are just not a conducive learning environment. Reducing the pupil-to-teacher ratio allows for the improvement of the quality of outcomes by giving teachers more time and opportunity to properly assess and support each child in their charge. We are currently asking our educators to work continuously at 150%, it is just not a sustainable situation.
The reduction of the pupil-to-teacher ratio should thus be a central policy goal of government. The achievement of this policy goal will drive the construction of more schools in the right locations, and the recruitment and training of more teachers. The training of additional staff should be an obvious policy anyway. But there is no sign of new teaching training colleges being built and the capacity to train teachers being increased.
Certainly, there are other challenges to be addressed within our education system. Both teachers and schoolchildren need more support, but I can think of no better starting point and no policy with a bigger positive impact than the pursuit of a reduction in the pupil-to-teacher ratio.
Mark Townsend
Via email
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Sanef surprised and disappointed by decision not to publish matric results
Law forces state to stop publishing matric results on media platforms
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.