Bourse gives up most of the previous day’s gains after mining companies were hit by weaker commodity prices
All the Nedlac parties have started afresh on President Cyril Ramaphosa’s much-trumpeted social compact, but to what end?
Gauteng MEC asks mayor Randall Williams to respond to allegations over orders to support a bid proposal for refurbishment
The governing party is discussing whether those criminally convicted of a serious crime should still have a home in the ANC
The producer banks on metals vital to the hydrogen economy, which the International Energy Agency says offers ‘huge potential’ for Africa
Wage increases above the Reserve Bank’s inflation target range of 3-6% raise the prospect of a wage price spiral with second-round effects on inflation, Bank deputy governor warns
The claim by Sars that it costs the country R31bn is wrong — the real cost is about R4bn a year
Federal Reserve officials said it may take longer than expected for inflation to ease, minutes from latest meeting show
Fast bowlers Kagiso Rabada and Anrich Nortjé make full use of conducive conditions to rip through the England top order
German traffic police are investigating the cause of the incident, which police say involved an autonomous vehicle
The problem, quite simple yet seemingly impossible to solve, lies in the way “science” is understood — or misunderstood (“Ramaphosa’s instinct in vaccine mandates correct, so drop the task teams and act”, November 30).
Many people think of science in terms of it “proving” things, of it being able to show what is “right”, or even of it being the “truth” about a subject.
Yet science does none of this. It is best seen as an ongoing inquiry whose conclusions are only ever provisional — that is, open to being shown later to have been mistaken. Meanwhile, it is the surest knowledge we have on a subject at any given point.
What prevents everyone from getting this? Why don’t they see that of course science disagrees with itself, so how can some people “know” that their facts and figures are correct and others are incorrect or even “fake news”? Why do so many of us suppose vaccines must work perfectly in all cases at all times or be rejected as if they don’t work at all?
Answers cannot lie in the “falsity” or “truth” of science out there, but in us, in our individual psychology, in what we are and “know”.
Paul WhelanVia BusinessLIVE
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to email@example.com. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Would you like to comment on this article? Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.