LETTER: Dogmatic Manyi backs Zuma regardless of facts
Mzwanele Manyi, who has also defended the Guptas, is driven by flawed reasoning
02 November 2021 - 17:24
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
So “judge” Mzwanele Manyi has ruled that Pietermaritzburg high court judge Piet Koen’s 187-page judgment was “irrational” and “biased”, denouncing it as “the fruit of a poison tree”, less than an hour after Koen had dismissed former president Jacob Zuma’s special plea application to prevent state prosecutor Billy Downer from presiding over the racketeering and corruption case.
It took several weeks for Koen to arrive at the verdict that there was no legal basis for Downer to not preside over Zuma’s matter. But for “appellant judge Manyi” it takes less an hour to sift through all the evidence, running into several thousands of pages, weigh up the pros and cons of the matter, and arrive at his “conclusion” of bias and “irrationality”.
It is difficult to have a decent and logical discussion with Manyi. He has defended the corruption-ridden Guptas with all his might and passion. He is dogmatic, and often driven by passion and illogic as he seeks to portray Zuma as a man who is denied justice and treated unfairly by our courts.
Manyi must come to terms with the reality that the judiciary is obligated by the constitution and the law to act independently. We might not like some judgments, but we can rest assured that “the judicial authority is vested in courts, and that courts are independent and subject only to the constitution and the law, which they must apply impartially and without fear, favour or prejudice”.
Any judge who disregards these prescripts is not “fit and proper”, and ought to be dealt with accordingly by the relevant authority. If Manyi thinks judges have made mistakes in the application of the law, he is entitled to take them on review. That is how unhappy litigants ought to behave.
Lastly, Manyi is wrong in addressing Zuma as “His Excellency President Jacob Zuma”. I know it is a bitter pill for him to swallow, but swallow it he must because reality tells us Zuma is a former president.
Jo-Mangaliso Mdhlela,Via email
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Send your letter by email to letters@businesslive.co.za. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: Dogmatic Manyi backs Zuma regardless of facts
Mzwanele Manyi, who has also defended the Guptas, is driven by flawed reasoning
So “judge” Mzwanele Manyi has ruled that Pietermaritzburg high court judge Piet Koen’s 187-page judgment was “irrational” and “biased”, denouncing it as “the fruit of a poison tree”, less than an hour after Koen had dismissed former president Jacob Zuma’s special plea application to prevent state prosecutor Billy Downer from presiding over the racketeering and corruption case.
It took several weeks for Koen to arrive at the verdict that there was no legal basis for Downer to not preside over Zuma’s matter. But for “appellant judge Manyi” it takes less an hour to sift through all the evidence, running into several thousands of pages, weigh up the pros and cons of the matter, and arrive at his “conclusion” of bias and “irrationality”.
It is difficult to have a decent and logical discussion with Manyi. He has defended the corruption-ridden Guptas with all his might and passion. He is dogmatic, and often driven by passion and illogic as he seeks to portray Zuma as a man who is denied justice and treated unfairly by our courts.
Manyi must come to terms with the reality that the judiciary is obligated by the constitution and the law to act independently. We might not like some judgments, but we can rest assured that “the judicial authority is vested in courts, and that courts are independent and subject only to the constitution and the law, which they must apply impartially and without fear, favour or prejudice”.
Any judge who disregards these prescripts is not “fit and proper”, and ought to be dealt with accordingly by the relevant authority. If Manyi thinks judges have made mistakes in the application of the law, he is entitled to take them on review. That is how unhappy litigants ought to behave.
Lastly, Manyi is wrong in addressing Zuma as “His Excellency President Jacob Zuma”. I know it is a bitter pill for him to swallow, but swallow it he must because reality tells us Zuma is a former president.
Jo-Mangaliso Mdhlela,Via email
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Send your letter by email to letters@businesslive.co.za. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
CARMEL RICKARD: Zuma’s doomed appeal
Jacob Zuma gets ball rolling to delay his April court date
TOM EATON: Why the low turnout makes us feel so low and empty
NATASHA MARRIAN: ANC faces uphill battle to win back metros
EDITORIAL: Voters, tired of rhetoric, want real change
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
Jacob Zuma gets ball rolling to delay his April court date
Judge dismisses Jacob Zuma’s special plea, and arms deal trial to start in April
Black Business Council steers course between regulator and Sipho Pityana
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.