LETTER: Chicken importers have to make stance clear over master plan
17 October 2021 - 19:25
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
David Wolpert’s outright rejection of the poultry master plan raises questions about the commitment of the chicken importers represented by the Association of Meat Importers and Exporters (Amie).
Wolpert is the previous CEO of Amie. His successor, Paul Matthew, signed the master plan in November 2019 that Wolpert says is contrary to importers’ interests because it aims to reduce imports and their share of the SA chicken market. (Poultry master plan harms the industry and consumers, October 7).
Matthew signed on behalf of Amie members and associate members, including large SA importers such as Merlog Foods, and major chicken exporters in Brazil, the US and Europe. They are all listed at the back of the master plan.
If Wolpert, who headed Amie for many years, believes that importers will not profit from the master plan, he may not be alone. Some may follow the lead of Matthew who has since signing the master plan argued forcibly against localisation and import tariffs, both key aspects of the master plan.
The SA Poultry Association (Sapa), which represents local producers, has voiced its full support for the master plan. It is time for Amie to state unequivocally where it stands on behalf of importers and foreign producers. Its ally, the Emerging Black Importers and Exporters of SA (Ebiesa), also a signatory to the master plan, has been unrepentant in its opposition to import tariffs.
Ebrahim Patel, the minister of trade, industry & competition who is driving the master plan, has a right to know whether the master plan still has the backing of chicken importers.
Are chicken importers going to support plans to enlarge the local industry, contain imports and combat dumping and illegal trade such as efforts to reduce or evade import duties? Where does Amie stand on transformation, an important issue on which it has been silent?
Are importers going to profess support for the master plan while doing their best to frustrate its implementation?
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: Chicken importers have to make stance clear over master plan
David Wolpert’s outright rejection of the poultry master plan raises questions about the commitment of the chicken importers represented by the Association of Meat Importers and Exporters (Amie).
Wolpert is the previous CEO of Amie. His successor, Paul Matthew, signed the master plan in November 2019 that Wolpert says is contrary to importers’ interests because it aims to reduce imports and their share of the SA chicken market. (Poultry master plan harms the industry and consumers, October 7).
Matthew signed on behalf of Amie members and associate members, including large SA importers such as Merlog Foods, and major chicken exporters in Brazil, the US and Europe. They are all listed at the back of the master plan.
If Wolpert, who headed Amie for many years, believes that importers will not profit from the master plan, he may not be alone. Some may follow the lead of Matthew who has since signing the master plan argued forcibly against localisation and import tariffs, both key aspects of the master plan.
The SA Poultry Association (Sapa), which represents local producers, has voiced its full support for the master plan. It is time for Amie to state unequivocally where it stands on behalf of importers and foreign producers. Its ally, the Emerging Black Importers and Exporters of SA (Ebiesa), also a signatory to the master plan, has been unrepentant in its opposition to import tariffs.
Ebrahim Patel, the minister of trade, industry & competition who is driving the master plan, has a right to know whether the master plan still has the backing of chicken importers.
Are chicken importers going to support plans to enlarge the local industry, contain imports and combat dumping and illegal trade such as efforts to reduce or evade import duties? Where does Amie stand on transformation, an important issue on which it has been silent?
Are importers going to profess support for the master plan while doing their best to frustrate its implementation?
Did they sign with their fingers crossed?
Francois Baird,
Founder, FairPlay
LETTER: Poultry master plan harms the industry and consumers
Calls for government to enforce localisation policies
LETTER: Feeble trade policies will deliver poor returns
PAUL MATTHEW: Where is the dynamism in SA’s trade policy?
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
Time for AMIE to state where it stands on the poultry master plan
LETTER: Poultry payback time
LETTER: Let’s see the proof
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.