Crawford-Browne’s tendentious historical cherry-picking  should be ignored (“No evidence to support myths around Israel (https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/opinion/letters/2021-06-01-letter-no-evidence-to-support-myths-around-israel/)”, June 1). But, for the record, some of the errant nonsense he presents ought to be corrected.

First, while an argument could be made that Abraham and Moses are “an allegorical myth”, there is abundant evidence to support the historicity of King David. Take only the inscription in the ancient Israelite city of Dan, discovered by the archaeologist Avraham Biran, that is dated to the 9th century BCE and refers to the “House of David”. ..

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.