As a certified financial planner with a BCom honours degree and 40 years of service to my clients, I take extreme offence to Stephen Cranston’s depiction of independent advisers as “beer-swilling extroverts and not necessarily that bright” in his argument for why they use portfolio managers to manage their clients’ investments (“There are many benefits to using discretionary fund managers (https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/opinion/columnists/2021-03-25-stephen-cranston-there-are-many-benefits-to-using-discretionary-fund-managers/)”, March 25). 

While the rest of the article was well written and provided valuable information to the public, this remark reveals a bias by the writer that is of great concern. To single out independent advisers for this attack is even more concerning, as I believe — as an independent adviser for the past 32 years — that we are the group least conflicted by considerations other than the interest of the client. Clients would not have stayed with me fo...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.