The Mabola Protected Environment. Picture: FLICKR
The Mabola Protected Environment. Picture: FLICKR

Peter Sullivan’s letter apropos the “MEC’s meddling hands” — referring to coal mining and the Mabola Protected Environment (MPE), a strategic water resource area — correctly reminds us of the infamous and deceitful decision of former environment and mining ministers that was later set aside by the Constitutional Court (“Minor politician’s meddling hands”, February 17).

In 2018 Vusumuzi Shongwe, MEC for land & environmental affairs in Mpumalanga, tried unsuccessfully to derail the legal process. Apparently he has now reappeared, again trying to revoke the protected status of the relevant part of the MPE. Why? What motivation emerged?

Surely it is legally incompetent for a province, never mind a provincial councillor, to purport to override a valid declaration of a protected environment made under a national statute passed by the SA parliament?

Kevin Gill

JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an e-mail with your comments. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Send your letter by e-mail to Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.

Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.