LETTER: Expropriation Bill is no change for the better
Investors do not put their money in a country where the basic protection of their money and property is subject to political party dogma
Reading the text of the rejigged property expropriation bill leads to a conclusion that what the state now intends is the same disregard for private property rights with just a few cosmetic changes. The medicine still tastes awful, despite the addition of kinder words and lashings of syrup.
No foreign investor will be fooled for an instant. As the Institute of Race Relations bluntly put it: the SA government “should remember that it is no small matter to tamper with the Bill of Rights. To do this is to degrade the protections SA’s people have vis-à-vis the state”.
Investors in a country do not put their money in a place where the basic protection of their money and property is subject to local political party dogma. Leaving disputes to the courts to resolve does not obscure the fact that the decision not to pay compensation, and indeed the decision to expropriate, will be with politicians.
The bill is up for comment for a little while before it gets the parliamentary rubber stamp and it may, heaven willing, change or, better still, be dropped entirely. If it does come before parliament and get through in its present form, as is more likely, it will water down any economic recovery plan and make the restoration of our ailing economy even more difficult. It certainly will not attract foreign investment. Or create jobs.
Janine Myburgh, Cape Chamber of Commerce & Industry
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an e-mail with your comments. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Send your letter by e-mail to email@example.com. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime phone number.
Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.