Picture: 123RF
Picture: 123RF

it is difficult to understand the government’s reasons for reimposing the ban on wine exports a mere 10 days after lifting it.

Is the Treasury so flush with cash that it does not need the taxes due on the profits? Surely not. Is the health minister worried about farm labourers picking grapes while ignoring social distancing? That seems a bit thin.

What seems to be the reason has nothing whatever to do with dictating better health habits in a time of lockdown, or for that matter reducing alcohol-fuelled gender-based violence.

Rather, the ban is aimed at reducing the temptation of gangsters to steal wine when it is being taken to the ports for export — the order to cease and desist being given by none other than the transport minister, presumably at the urging of the head of the police service.

Every way one looks at it, it seems a prime example of the exercise of power for the thrill of it, regardless of the damage it does — in this instance also to the Treasury, which needs every cent in tax revenue it can raise from the private sector.

The way things are going, some people are beginning to think some measures taken to fight the spread of Covid-19 are akin to a man shooting himself in the foot because he is suffering from gout.

The sooner this ban is lifted, the sooner our economy will recover once the emergency is over. Leaving it in place serves no purpose, does great harm to a foreign exchange-generating industry, starves the Treasury of resources needed for the emergency, and is no help to thousands of farm workers and their families.

Geoff Jacobs
Cape Chamber of Commerce & Industry

Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.