LETTER: Mischief for political gain
Proposed changes to section 25 of constitution do not guarantee impartiality nor equitability
The proposed changes to section 25 of the constitution do not guarantee impartiality, nor transparency, nor equitability, as the courts are far from free, fair, transparent or impartial.
The lower courts and high court (excluding the Supreme Court of Appeal and Constitutional Court) are inept, corrupt and corruptible, and the amendment is arbitrary, irrational, unfair and biased. It is in fact a fundamental mischief for political gain, rather than redistribution of wealth.
It presupposes the affected party has funds and access to substantial legal representation and superior counsel. It costs about R750,000 to get through a high court trial, high court appeal and appeal court process.
The act must fully legislate open, transparent and accountable transactions, and the government must finance all legal processes through superior private legal representation. And, such costs must not fall on the “targeted” land owner or occupier.
This would create a level playing field. It must also stipulate that all state land, including the Zulu kingdom’s 33-million hectares, are first accessed and used. It must promulgate productivity as a peremptory requisite for occupation, otherwise another Zimbabwe will result.
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an e-mail with your comments. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Send your letter by e-mail to email@example.com. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.