Attorney Emile Myburgh gave the impression in his article that the policy (https://webmail.timesmedia.co.za/owa/redir.aspx?REF=Lc7tTLd4oe9ILo8t4Ll6lhFH30D3auUWhIdLlo-8w39Dk993jHHXCAFodHRwOi8vd3d3LnNhcWEub3JnLnphL2RvY3MvcG9sLzIwMTgvU0FRQVBvbGljeSZDcml0ZXJpYVdFQi5wZGY.) of the SA Qualifications Authority (SAQA) is inconsistent with the law (“State policies are at odds with investment drive (https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/opinion/2019-11-18-state-policies-are-at-odds-with-investment-drive/)”, November 18). However, he draws incorrect conclusions based on mistaken facts, which this response seeks to clarify.

Myburgh says SAQA operates under the SAQA Act, which is not correct; He confuses the application process for the evaluation of foreign qualifications with the appeal process; SAQA does not prohibit attorneys from assisting qualification holders; and The SAQA policy (https://webmail.timesmedia.co.za/owa/redir.aspx?REF=Lc7tTLd4oe9ILo8t4Ll6lhFH30D3auUWhIdLlo-8w39Dk993jHHXCAFo...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.