LETTER: SA’s power play
Taking 4,800MW of coal-fired generation off the table would really grab the world’s attention
Richard Worthington argued in his climate action summit article that to make a real impression at the UN Climate Change Conference, the South African government should wipe 1,500MW of additional cold-fired generating capacity off the new integrated resource plan (IRP).
Given the global panic over climate change, which has largely gone over the heads of South Africans, obsessed as we are with internal problems, I think that our government would be underselling itself with such a proposal. When you don’t have good hand and are desperate, it sometimes pays to bet the house.
Sure, leave the additional 1,500MW of coal-fired generation off the IRP, but at the climate summit propose the discontinuation of construction and then complete closure of the Kusile power station. Taking a potential 4,800MW of coal-fired generation off the table would really grab the world’s attention in the right way.
But such a philanthropic gesture would require “compensation” in the region of R200bn plus. As Kusile is never going to work particularly well with huge maintenance costs hanging about its chimneys for the next 40 years, why not close it down before it even starts belching carbon into the atmosphere, make the world feel better at the same time and use the compensation wisely to extract Eskom from its death spiral?
As other coal stations are closed down, independent power producers (IPPs) will be able to supply the shortfall with renewables more cheaply than Eskom ever could, while doing a lot less damage to our environment. If baseload becomes a problem, an additional gas-powered station or two should do the trick.
Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.