About 50 years ago when I studied auditing one of the primary functions was to ensure the books were correct, true and fair. This was because those who appointed the auditors, the shareholders, did so in the expectation that the business was being properly managed and its assets were not being squandered or stolen. Deloitte’s Andrew Mackie went to great lengths to explain that fraud detection is no longer the primary objective of an audit — a separate forensic audit is required (Bridge expectation gap with a new consensus on audits, July 18). But there is clearly a gap between the expectations of those who employ auditors, and the auditors themselves. If I knew what I now hear about Steinhoff and its auditors I would not have bought their shares, instead of relying on the audits. Mackie calls for an independent review to assess the needs of 21st-century society. This sounds like another smokescreen. Those who rely on audits need to be reviewing their expectations. We have been misle...
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Subscribe now to unlock this article.
Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).
There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.
Cancel anytime.
Questions? Email helpdesk@businesslive.co.za or call 0860 52 52 00. Got a subscription voucher? Redeem it now.