In a timeous warning to government, an IMF delegation states that we are not doing what it takes to decrease unemployment, poverty and inequality (IMF issues ominous warning about public sector, June 12). Correct — but even the IMF retails the myth that we, or any developing country, can solve poverty and inequality simultaneously. They are contradictory goals. In 1980 China had half a billion people in desperate poverty, and a "good" Gini coefficient of 0.16. Four decades later nearly all the citizens have been lifted out of survival mode. Income per capita, on an annual basis, has risen from $150 to $9,000. But the Gini has risen to 0.55! This is regarded as nearly as "bad" as ours. The fact is that Gini is a relative measure, while poverty is absolute. A billion Chinese are vastly better off than they would have been in 1980, but entrepreneurs and skilled people’s income has risen even faster, hence the higher Gini. This is not a travesty but a natural development in rising out o...
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Subscribe now to unlock this article.
Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).
There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.
Cancel anytime.
Questions? Email helpdesk@businesslive.co.za or call 0860 52 52 00. Got a subscription voucher? Redeem it now.