Ayabonga Cawe is correct in noting that land and agrarian reform is complex, and not reducible to ownership and title deeds (Misplaced fixation on title deeds is a convenient diversion, May 21). But he is equally incorrect to suggest that the nationalisation of land would not be a "disincentive to investment". He argues there has "surely not" been a fall-off in mining investment as a result of the state taking "custodianship" of mineral rights. This is highly questionable. SA’s mining industry has taken a battering in recent years. The National Development Plan noted that mining output shrank between 2001 and 2008 — during the commodity boom — citing, among other things, "uncertainty in the regulatory framework and property rights". While concerns about ownership are not the only brakes on mining, they are significant ones. Moreover, as Cawe acknowledges, the ability to use land as collateral for credit is essential for "large or medium-scale agriculture", a part of the economy whos...
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Subscribe now to unlock this article.
Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).
There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.
Cancel anytime.
Questions? Email helpdesk@businesslive.co.za or call 0860 52 52 00. Got a subscription voucher? Redeem it now.