When you say in your leader (And now Shaun must fall, March 19) that Shaun Abrahams made no decision at all, you are correct. The decision to prosecute Jacob Zuma was made many years ago, then reversed, and then that reversal set aside. It was clarified that this meant the original decision to prosecute stood as if it had never been reversed. One wonders then what the threatened review of Abrahams’s decision relates to. Is it the decision to not not prosecute? Sydney Kaye Cape Town

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.