I refer to your latest reports on the Bell Pottinger scandal. Clearly this latest debacle by the UK-based public relations firm has been its Waterloo, with staff and clients running for the hills. What seems to have escaped the media searchlight into this firm’s alleged nefarious shenanigans is the fact that it was involved in SA’s 1994 elections. FW de Klerk and his National Party were the UK firm’s clients. If it was a given that our new democracy was to be a runaway success, why did the election protagonists need a group like Bell Pottinger? Given that the promises made to the hapless crowds who queued for hours to put their crosses for the ANC contributed largely to this heretofore revolutionary movement’s resounding victory, was the role played by Bell Pottinger connected perhaps to polishing the images of the two parties involved? The ANC’s background needing a bit of airbrushing after bombing their way to power, while De Klerk and his NP buddies were going to "power share" wi...
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Subscribe now to unlock this article.
Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).
There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.
Cancel anytime.
Questions? Email helpdesk@businesslive.co.za or call 0860 52 52 00. Got a subscription voucher? Redeem it now.