KATE THOMPSON DAVY: Where the human stops and AI begins will need some humane answers
The authorship of work by AI is being tested all over the world with SA contributing to precedents too
Followers of artificial intelligence (AI) news may have seen that a US civil judgement on copyright — specifically judgment handed down last Friday in the District of Columbia by judge Beryl A Howell — has upheld the ruling that a work of art created by AI without human input cannot be copyrighted under US law.
This stems from a patent application by one Stephen Thaler, a computer scientist who wanted to register an artwork for copyright made by a computer system he calls a “creativity machine”. Thaler applied, “listing the computer system as the author and explaining that the copyright should transfer to him as the owner of the machine”, the judge’s report says. ..
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Subscribe now to unlock this article.
Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).
There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.
Cancel anytime.
Questions? Email helpdesk@businesslive.co.za or call 0860 52 52 00. Got a subscription voucher? Redeem it now.