It has become a truism to say Cyril Ramaphosa is a weak president. He is indecisive; he rules by committee; he will not depart until the last soul in his party is on board. The arguments are painfully familiar.

Here is another perspective, one that takes in the last half-century of the exercise of presidential power. Viewed over this stretch of time a striking pattern emerges: SA has a history of presidents who have overreached and fallen down; presidents whose careers ended badly because they miscalculated the extent of their power...

BL Premium

This article is reserved for our subscribers.

A subscription helps you enjoy the best of our business content every day along with benefits such as articles from our international business news partners; ProfileData financial data; and digital access to the Sunday Times and Sunday Times Daily.

Already subscribed? Simply sign in below.

Questions or problems? Email or call 0860 52 52 00. Got a subscription voucher? Redeem it now