Who has interpreted political events in SA more intelligently of late: the commentariat, whose vocation is to understand politics, or ordinary people in the street? If the question seems a provocation, it certainly is. For some of the commentariat’s analysis of the revelations around the funding of Cyril Ramaphosa’s ANC presidential campaign has been worse than dire. It has been so incompetent and naive as to constitute a dereliction of professional duty.

From a prominent Sunday Times columnist to a slew of television commentators, a shibboleth has emerged: what the funding of Ramaphosa’s campaign shows, it is said, is that dividing politicians into good and bad is useless because they are all corrupt. The Guptas may have bought Jacob Zuma, but those who funded Ramaphosa’s campaign have bought Ramaphosa. All politicians are for sale and that’s all there is to be said...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.