Even professors ask for extensions – the chair of the VAT review panel, Prof Ingrid Woolard, can attest to that. Unlike many struggling undergraduate students, they often get them. I thought of this as I reflected on the task we, alongside eight other panel members, were given by the National Treasury to consider an approach to mitigate the effect of the one-percentage-point rise in VAT announced in February’s budget. Scope and deadline changes are the nature of such an inquiry, especially when a panel consists of members with very strong views, as ours had. My views on the merits and inevitability of the VAT increase are well documented. It is a regressive tax and makes the system of indirect taxes (and the overall tax system) generally regressive. It hurts the pockets of the poor. I accept, however, that zero-rating mitigates some of the regressivity. To what extent it does this is important. I was asked to serve on a panel that would consider whether the existing 19 items that ca...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.