As a rule of thumb, it’s always unwise for laymen to comment on the merits or otherwise of rulings by the judiciary. But the judiciary, which is part of the architecture of democracy-supporting institutions, has become such a fundamental part of our body politic that it’s hard to resist the temptation to decipher the implications of last week’s remarks by the Constitutional Court on the social grants crisis. After another progress report by the Department of Social Development, including its South African Social Security Agency (Sassa), the country’s highest court ordered that the department present a contingency plan and a programme to communicate with the 17-million recipients of social assistance every month. In essence the court, which has in effect been forced to monitor what should be an administrative function of the government, now believes we could be teetering perilously close to the brink we were at earlier in 2017. To refresh readers’ minds, at the beginning of 2017, the...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.