If the Constitution was a person, it would be a serial abuse victim. It has been fashionable for a while for South Africans who are unhappy with the state of society to blame the Constitution. The favoured attack is the claim that it was written to accommodate the saintly Nelson Mandela, not those who came after him. Those who say this rarely explain what they mean, but a little decoding reveals that they claim the Constitution gives the president huge powers that were safe in Madiba’s hands but not in those of Jacob Zuma. Commentators who make this claim are usually impressed with their own cleverness; it is hard to see why. The president in our system is essentially a prime minister with some extra powers — he or she can be removed by a simple majority of MPs; in presidential systems the head of government can be removed only by a supermajority, usually after a trial. Most other presidents do not need to contend with courts telling them who they can appoint to key positions.Unlike...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.