When President Jacob Zuma intervened in the Treasury, alarm bells were set off in the market place and at the credit ratings agencies. The danger is that fiscal conservatism in SA — the willingness to fund government spending without printing money— will be sacrificed to other interests, making the government more prone to raising loans from the central bank rather than raising additional revenue or issuing more debt. And when a government borrows heavily from its central bank and spends the proceeds, it adds to the money supply. This usually brings more spending, more inflation and a weaker exchange rate in its wake. Zuma interfered initially in December 2015. The negative impact on the South African bond and currency markets was immediate. The spread between South African bond yields and their US Treasury equivalents widened dramatically by close to an extra 2% per annum to 8.14% per annum. This 8% per annum a became the faster rate at which the rand was expected to depreciate aga...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.