At a cursory glance, there is nothing wrong with the research. The scientific article ticks all the right boxes and should get us all atwitter. The research looks at how fire management in the Kruger National Park is promoting biodiversity. Tick. It is published in one of the world’s leading academic journals, Science. Tick. This means it has been peer-reviewed. Tick. It makes SA look good. Tick. But this piece of research has one major, irredeemable flaw: it does not have a single South African or African author. This is not an isolated incident, but rather the latest in what is commonplace in a country as naturally rich as SA: foreign scientists come in, use our resources to get published and build a name out of it — with no benefit accruing to local scientists, many of whom have dedicated their careers to the same subject. A journal like Science makes careers. Along with the likes of Nature, the Lancet and Cell, if a researcher manages to get a foot in the door at one of these el...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.