NICHOLAS SHUBITZ: Rare earth dominance by Brics bloc set to continue
Inability to decouple from a reliance on elements sourced from China not easy for the US and the rest of the G7
06 January 2025 - 05:00
byNicholas Shubitz
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
There is a well-known Yiddish proverb that says that if you want to make God laugh, tell him your plans.
However, for the US and the rest of the G7 an inability to decouple from a reliance on rare earth elements sourced from China is no laughing matter. Rare earths remain crucial to the adoption of green energy and possess significant defence industry applications, giving the Brics bloc a clear advantage with respect to these strategic minerals.
Despite various initiatives in Washington, China’s government-subsidised rare earth mining and refining industry continues to eclipse Western efforts to diversify rare earth supplies. Moreover, even if the West succeeds in diversifying the global rare earth elements supply chain the US and its allies could simply come to rely on other Brics nations such as Brazil and SA.
This creates an interesting geopolitical dynamic where despite historical financial advantages the West remains reliant on emerging markets for key natural resources. G7 countries still rely heavily on Russian and Middle Eastern crude, nickel and coal from Indonesia, and Kazakhstani uranium. Maintaining this reliance with respect to Chinese rare earths is something the Western world, and the US in particular, would prefer to avoid.
Though the US is the world’s largest oil producer, for Washington China’s dominance in rare earths remains a concern. In addition to their use in wind turbines and electric vehicles, these elements are also used to produce cutting edge cruise missiles, radars and unmanned aerial vehicles. As a result, China’s dominance is more than just an economic issue for the US. It is a national security concern.
Wind, solar, batteries and electric vehicle production has helped China reduce its dependence on coal and imported fossil fuels. This has improved China’s air quality, public health and balance of trade. Clean energy technologies have become a major source of export revenue for Beijing, boosting Chinese wages as the nation moves up the global manufacturing value chain from a producer of low-cost goods to a country that exports more advanced technologies.
While Western firms scour the earth looking for alternative supplies, Chinese producers, backed by state financing and well-developed domestic supply chains, are able to maintain operations even during economic downturns.
This state support keeps prices down, undercutting Western competitors and ensuring Chinese miners, refiners and clean energy technology producers can maintain their global dominance despite increased competition from abroad.
Graphic: KAREN MOOLMAN
As a result of huge state subsidies, China now commands 70% of global rare earth mining and 90% of processing capacity, a near-monopoly that has become a strategic concern for the US. Worryingly for Washington, China’s control of key resources extends beyond rare earths to include other critical materials for the green energy transition, such as graphite, cobalt and nickel, making China’s lead in the sector even more difficult to overcome.
A site in SA near the grazing animals of the Kruger National Park has become a focal point for US efforts to challenge China’s rare earth dominance, with the US pledging financial support to extract rare earths from gypsum waste at a site in Limpopo. However, the project’s viability is under threat due to a 60% drop in rare earth prices since 2022, casting doubt as to whether the project will secure the $250m in funding required to begin operations.
The US International Development Finance Corporation has already invested $50m in the project, reflecting a desire to support African critical mineral projects with an estimated $700m in proposed future investments. However, low prices resulting from subsidised Chinese production have led analysts to question the economic feasibility of moving forward with many of these greenfield projects.
In addition to rare earths, the recent slump in prices for lithium, cobalt, nickel and graphite, key components in electric vehicle battery production, has seen Western producers shut down mines, cut production and scale back expansion plans. Major players such as BHP and Glencore are among the affected firms, highlighting the vulnerability of Western projects to market fluctuations largely driven by Chinese supply and demand.
With the world’s third-largest rare earth reserves, Brazil could become a major player in the sector. Brazil’s efforts to attract investment are supported by low labour costs, hydropower (which provides over 60% of Brazil’s electricity needs), established regulations and close proximity to US importers eager to diversify supplies. Brazil’s first rare earth elements mine, Serra Verde, began commercial production in 2024 and is expected to double output by 2030.
However, Brazil faces many of the same challenges as others that would challenge China. Rare earth prices remain low due to high Chinese production, while Brazil lacks refining capacity and overall competitiveness when compared with Chinese firms. Nervous lenders in a high global interest rate environment have added to the difficulties Brazil faces in attracting the necessary investments to scale its rare earth industry.
Considering the fact that Serra Verde mine took 15 years to commence production suggests that long lead times further complicate matters. Nevertheless, like Russia and India, which also feature in the worldwide top 10 for rare earth reserves, Brazil still has plenty of potential and the Brics remain poised to dominate this critical market for decades to come.
That said, the market is still dominated by China, whose output of almost a quarter of a million metric tons is five times higher than any other producer. China’s strategy of flooding the market poses a significant challenge for other producers, with Beijing increasing production quotas for state-owned miners despite falling prices. This has seen the stock prices of US and Australian producers experience sharp declines.
Western efforts to reduce dependence on China for rare earths face significant obstacles. The head start enjoyed by China, supported by subsidies, and recent low prices, all make it difficult for new projects to get off the ground. Even if successful, the diversification of supply chains may see the West become increasingly reliant on other Brics nations with large rare earth element reserves.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
NICHOLAS SHUBITZ: Rare earth dominance by Brics bloc set to continue
Inability to decouple from a reliance on elements sourced from China not easy for the US and the rest of the G7
There is a well-known Yiddish proverb that says that if you want to make God laugh, tell him your plans.
However, for the US and the rest of the G7 an inability to decouple from a reliance on rare earth elements sourced from China is no laughing matter. Rare earths remain crucial to the adoption of green energy and possess significant defence industry applications, giving the Brics bloc a clear advantage with respect to these strategic minerals.
Despite various initiatives in Washington, China’s government-subsidised rare earth mining and refining industry continues to eclipse Western efforts to diversify rare earth supplies. Moreover, even if the West succeeds in diversifying the global rare earth elements supply chain the US and its allies could simply come to rely on other Brics nations such as Brazil and SA.
This creates an interesting geopolitical dynamic where despite historical financial advantages the West remains reliant on emerging markets for key natural resources. G7 countries still rely heavily on Russian and Middle Eastern crude, nickel and coal from Indonesia, and Kazakhstani uranium. Maintaining this reliance with respect to Chinese rare earths is something the Western world, and the US in particular, would prefer to avoid.
Though the US is the world’s largest oil producer, for Washington China’s dominance in rare earths remains a concern. In addition to their use in wind turbines and electric vehicles, these elements are also used to produce cutting edge cruise missiles, radars and unmanned aerial vehicles. As a result, China’s dominance is more than just an economic issue for the US. It is a national security concern.
Wind, solar, batteries and electric vehicle production has helped China reduce its dependence on coal and imported fossil fuels. This has improved China’s air quality, public health and balance of trade. Clean energy technologies have become a major source of export revenue for Beijing, boosting Chinese wages as the nation moves up the global manufacturing value chain from a producer of low-cost goods to a country that exports more advanced technologies.
While Western firms scour the earth looking for alternative supplies, Chinese producers, backed by state financing and well-developed domestic supply chains, are able to maintain operations even during economic downturns.
This state support keeps prices down, undercutting Western competitors and ensuring Chinese miners, refiners and clean energy technology producers can maintain their global dominance despite increased competition from abroad.
As a result of huge state subsidies, China now commands 70% of global rare earth mining and 90% of processing capacity, a near-monopoly that has become a strategic concern for the US. Worryingly for Washington, China’s control of key resources extends beyond rare earths to include other critical materials for the green energy transition, such as graphite, cobalt and nickel, making China’s lead in the sector even more difficult to overcome.
A site in SA near the grazing animals of the Kruger National Park has become a focal point for US efforts to challenge China’s rare earth dominance, with the US pledging financial support to extract rare earths from gypsum waste at a site in Limpopo. However, the project’s viability is under threat due to a 60% drop in rare earth prices since 2022, casting doubt as to whether the project will secure the $250m in funding required to begin operations.
The US International Development Finance Corporation has already invested $50m in the project, reflecting a desire to support African critical mineral projects with an estimated $700m in proposed future investments. However, low prices resulting from subsidised Chinese production have led analysts to question the economic feasibility of moving forward with many of these greenfield projects.
In addition to rare earths, the recent slump in prices for lithium, cobalt, nickel and graphite, key components in electric vehicle battery production, has seen Western producers shut down mines, cut production and scale back expansion plans. Major players such as BHP and Glencore are among the affected firms, highlighting the vulnerability of Western projects to market fluctuations largely driven by Chinese supply and demand.
With the world’s third-largest rare earth reserves, Brazil could become a major player in the sector. Brazil’s efforts to attract investment are supported by low labour costs, hydropower (which provides over 60% of Brazil’s electricity needs), established regulations and close proximity to US importers eager to diversify supplies. Brazil’s first rare earth elements mine, Serra Verde, began commercial production in 2024 and is expected to double output by 2030.
However, Brazil faces many of the same challenges as others that would challenge China. Rare earth prices remain low due to high Chinese production, while Brazil lacks refining capacity and overall competitiveness when compared with Chinese firms. Nervous lenders in a high global interest rate environment have added to the difficulties Brazil faces in attracting the necessary investments to scale its rare earth industry.
Considering the fact that Serra Verde mine took 15 years to commence production suggests that long lead times further complicate matters. Nevertheless, like Russia and India, which also feature in the worldwide top 10 for rare earth reserves, Brazil still has plenty of potential and the Brics remain poised to dominate this critical market for decades to come.
That said, the market is still dominated by China, whose output of almost a quarter of a million metric tons is five times higher than any other producer. China’s strategy of flooding the market poses a significant challenge for other producers, with Beijing increasing production quotas for state-owned miners despite falling prices. This has seen the stock prices of US and Australian producers experience sharp declines.
Western efforts to reduce dependence on China for rare earths face significant obstacles. The head start enjoyed by China, supported by subsidies, and recent low prices, all make it difficult for new projects to get off the ground. Even if successful, the diversification of supply chains may see the West become increasingly reliant on other Brics nations with large rare earth element reserves.
• Shubitz is an independent Brics analyst.
READ MORE BY NICHOLAS SHUBITZ
NICHOLAS SHUBITZ: Why Trump’s trade war may end up being directed at his allies
NICHOLAS SHUBITZ: Donald Trump and curse of the Midas touch
NICHOLAS SHUBITZ: EU divided as China takes the lead in production of electric vehicles
NICHOLAS SHUBITZ: India puts prosperity before hostility despite election hard line on China
NICHOLAS SHUBITZ: Donald Trump re-election could accelerate dedollarisation
NICHOLAS SHUBITZ: Brazil’s success shows SA farmers can benefit from Brics
NICHOLAS SHUBITZ: Fast-approaching Brics summit could prove decisive
NICHOLAS SHUBITZ: India in good position to bring peace to Ukraine
NICHOLAS SHUBITZ: Asean giants and EU aspirants seek Brics membership
NICHOLAS SHUBITZ: Resource-rich Brics bloc now in a better position than the G7
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
G20 in push to boost the role of global development banks
WANDILE SIHLOBO: Keep the agricultural exports flowing
DAVID ADLER AND VARSHA GANDIKOTA-NELLUTLA: A moment of possibility on the ...
JOHN DLUDLU: SA’s momentous 2024
JUSTICE MALALA: Saving South Africa? It’s the economy, stupid
EDITORIAL: SA must ensure G20 runs seamlessly
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.