ADRIAN CLAYTON: Investing success comes from an awareness of history
The postmortems of past bubbles can provide useful tips on how to be on the right side of the next one
02 September 2024 - 05:00
byAdrian Clayton
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Investing success is not a gift of foresight, but rather an awareness of history. Picture: 123RF
Numerous investment bubbles have burst in the markets over the years, going as far back as the tulip mania of 1637 and the South Sea bubble of 1720.
Other well-known bubbles include the sub-prime and global financial crisis of 2007, from which US house prices took 10 years to recover; the collapse of JSE-listed property stocks in 2018, reaching 2010 levels before staging a recovery; and the dot-com bubble that burst in March 2000.
In 2017, the price of rhodium was $625/oz, and by April 2021 it had reached $30,000/oz. Fast forward to July 2023 and the price had dropped to $4,000/oz.
More recently in SA there was a construction stock bubble before the 2010 Fifa World Cup. In 1999, Murray & Roberts’ share price was R2.30, reaching R105 in 2008 before plunging to 60c in 2023, the same price it was in 1976.
In these episodes, big voices proclaimed “this time is different’’, causing believers to outnumber disbelievers. Doubters were disarmed by escalating share prices and accompanying narratives. But, after every one of these modern asset deflations, winners emerge and we must ask “how did they do it?’’.
There are two key features that winners get right. They avoid the bubble through skill, cynicism, research or experience, but endure lengthy periods of underperformance as bubbles take long to inflate but are quick to deflate. And they double down on their anti-bubble bet by buying the companies, sectors and asset classes being sold down to fund the hype.
Take the dot-com rage that began in 1995 just after commodity company share prices had peaked. Before 1995, Anglo American shares had rallied by 76%. This started in October 1992 and, ending in September 1994, the share gained 76%.
But from September 1994 to April 2000, Anglo American shares did nothing but deliver extreme volatility for their owners. Simultaneously, the Nasdaq rallied 500%.
The tech bubble then eventually burst in March 2000, the Nasdaq fell 75% over the following two years, retreating to 1996 levels. Had long-suffering Anglo shareholders simply held onto their shares from September 1994 to the next big correction, which was the great financial crisis in November 2007, their returns would have been 800%.
For the same period (September 1994 to November 2007), Nasdaq investors made only 267%, and faced a crisis of confidence, with their capital collapsing by 75% over 24 months.
But not all bubbles are obvious hacks (like tulips were or the South Sea Bubble of 1720 or maybe bitcoin is today — time will tell), in fact, many initiate their lives as legitimate exciting investments with superior growth prospects.
Take cloud computing and artificial intelligence (AI). These are long-term growth themes and company share prices should reflect this potential. So too were the early price increases in platinum group metals (PGMs) in 2018, reflecting the introduction of Regulation (EU) 2019/631, European emission regulations resulting in higher metal loadings.
But, unfortunately, at some point the pole is set too high, disappointment follows and prices fall. The reset is often sparked by one of two triggers.
The first is that an asset does not deliver its expected growth and becomes an “oh wow’’ moment for the market.
The second is that a moment of clarity increases the number of doubters relative to the believers — an example being an analyst report informing investors that to justify the share price of a specific listed electric vehicle manufacturer, the expected annual growth embedded in the share price would require that company to sell one of its cars to every one of the 8-billion people on the planet.
And then the great unwind begins.
So how do you build your capital, avoid fads, and unearth winners like Anglo’s of 1995? Start by analysing the postmortems of past bubbles to find common features, which include:
‘’Returns” well above equities, the best performing long-term growth asset;
Lack of cash flow — except for gold, which benefits from 2,000 years of history, investments are only worth their cash flow;
The pain trade by dissenters. Allan Gray almost shut its doors in the late 1990s as it bet on commodities rather than tech — this put them on the map; Charlie Munger avoided hyped real estate;
Talking heads — fad evangelists accompany big bubbles; and
If it is too good to be true — it is!
And find which areas of the market are out of fashion. Based on our bottom-up stock research, we believe the following areas in markets now offer long-term opportunities:
Healthcare stocks;
Consumer staples — populated by some of the world’s most resilient companies;
Tech stocks that do not need AI to justify their share prices;
Certain financials;
Mid and smaller capitalisation companies in the US;
Oil stocks; and
Emerging markets.
Investing success is not a gift of foresight, but rather an awareness of history.
Super-expensive investments carry the burden of expectations, and this encumbrance is usually too tough to bear. In contrast, ignored, even maligned assets are often laden with the highest prospective yield.
• Clayton is chief investment officer at Northstar Asset Management.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
ADRIAN CLAYTON: Investing success comes from an awareness of history
The postmortems of past bubbles can provide useful tips on how to be on the right side of the next one
Numerous investment bubbles have burst in the markets over the years, going as far back as the tulip mania of 1637 and the South Sea bubble of 1720.
Other well-known bubbles include the sub-prime and global financial crisis of 2007, from which US house prices took 10 years to recover; the collapse of JSE-listed property stocks in 2018, reaching 2010 levels before staging a recovery; and the dot-com bubble that burst in March 2000.
In 2017, the price of rhodium was $625/oz, and by April 2021 it had reached $30,000/oz. Fast forward to July 2023 and the price had dropped to $4,000/oz.
More recently in SA there was a construction stock bubble before the 2010 Fifa World Cup. In 1999, Murray & Roberts’ share price was R2.30, reaching R105 in 2008 before plunging to 60c in 2023, the same price it was in 1976.
In these episodes, big voices proclaimed “this time is different’’, causing believers to outnumber disbelievers. Doubters were disarmed by escalating share prices and accompanying narratives. But, after every one of these modern asset deflations, winners emerge and we must ask “how did they do it?’’.
There are two key features that winners get right. They avoid the bubble through skill, cynicism, research or experience, but endure lengthy periods of underperformance as bubbles take long to inflate but are quick to deflate. And they double down on their anti-bubble bet by buying the companies, sectors and asset classes being sold down to fund the hype.
Take the dot-com rage that began in 1995 just after commodity company share prices had peaked. Before 1995, Anglo American shares had rallied by 76%. This started in October 1992 and, ending in September 1994, the share gained 76%.
But from September 1994 to April 2000, Anglo American shares did nothing but deliver extreme volatility for their owners. Simultaneously, the Nasdaq rallied 500%.
The tech bubble then eventually burst in March 2000, the Nasdaq fell 75% over the following two years, retreating to 1996 levels. Had long-suffering Anglo shareholders simply held onto their shares from September 1994 to the next big correction, which was the great financial crisis in November 2007, their returns would have been 800%.
For the same period (September 1994 to November 2007), Nasdaq investors made only 267%, and faced a crisis of confidence, with their capital collapsing by 75% over 24 months.
But not all bubbles are obvious hacks (like tulips were or the South Sea Bubble of 1720 or maybe bitcoin is today — time will tell), in fact, many initiate their lives as legitimate exciting investments with superior growth prospects.
Take cloud computing and artificial intelligence (AI). These are long-term growth themes and company share prices should reflect this potential. So too were the early price increases in platinum group metals (PGMs) in 2018, reflecting the introduction of Regulation (EU) 2019/631, European emission regulations resulting in higher metal loadings.
But, unfortunately, at some point the pole is set too high, disappointment follows and prices fall. The reset is often sparked by one of two triggers.
The first is that an asset does not deliver its expected growth and becomes an “oh wow’’ moment for the market.
The second is that a moment of clarity increases the number of doubters relative to the believers — an example being an analyst report informing investors that to justify the share price of a specific listed electric vehicle manufacturer, the expected annual growth embedded in the share price would require that company to sell one of its cars to every one of the 8-billion people on the planet.
And then the great unwind begins.
So how do you build your capital, avoid fads, and unearth winners like Anglo’s of 1995? Start by analysing the postmortems of past bubbles to find common features, which include:
And find which areas of the market are out of fashion. Based on our bottom-up stock research, we believe the following areas in markets now offer long-term opportunities:
Investing success is not a gift of foresight, but rather an awareness of history.
Super-expensive investments carry the burden of expectations, and this encumbrance is usually too tough to bear. In contrast, ignored, even maligned assets are often laden with the highest prospective yield.
• Clayton is chief investment officer at Northstar Asset Management.
MARC HASENFUSS: What is a good executive worth?
YOUR MONEY: Looking into pension fund providers
Awful August for investment companies
The art of the interest rate cycle
WARWICK LUCAS: Structured deposits: a rose by another name
Afrimat: Sour and sweet
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
STEPHEN CRANSTON: How JSE and investment products have changed
BROKERS’ NOTES: Buy Mondi, take profit from Reits
SIMON BROWN: Looking back to look forward
PATRICE ROSSOU: SA assets pull off a podium finish
MARC HASENFUSS: What is a good executive worth?
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.