PIETMAN ROOS AND DAAN STEENKAMP: Laudable national data and cloud policy will enhance landscape
15 July 2024 - 05:00
byPietman Roos and Daan Steenkamp
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
On May 31 the department of communications & digital technologies published the national policy on data and cloud. It is mostly a coherent, sensible paper and the department deserves praise for policies that, if implemented, will improve the SA data landscape.
The new policy declares that government shall prioritise cloud services as the primary option for new ICT procurement. This will be a boon for the local data centre and cloud services industry.
The paper invites stakeholders to give feedback by July. There are five salient policy proposals that are not only worth further consideration, but are in fact worthy of their own policy papers. This is not a critique of the paper, but rather a reflection of the complexity of the subject.
The paper recognises that government collects vast amounts of data on its citizens in various formats, but more could be done to digitise data assets. For example, some information may be stored in hard copy paper format and other information is stored digitally. That causes inefficiencies, data gaps and potential for data loss. Ask anyone who has ever lost a marriage certificate.
The policy recognises the need for harmonisation of technical standards across government entities and the need for common data governance mechanisms to enable data integration and system interoperability. But the challenge is immense. Only limited data is available in machine-readable format, limiting data sharing not just among government entities but also with the private sector. This will require a deployment of technically skilled officials within the State Information Technology Agency and each government department, to such an extent that short-term advisers will be a necessity to fill the gap.
Self-provisioning
The paper advocates evidenced-based policy on the back of improved data sharing between government departments. Again, this is a wonderful idea but sceptics (and policy nerds) might recall that in the late 2000s the government committed to introduce Regulatory Impact Assessments (RIAs) as part of legislative proposals. As RIAs are unfortunately not part of SA’s policy development framework, the lofty ambition to have evidence-based policy is likely to suffer the same fate unless there is a fundamental change in approach.
The paper suggests that physical data centres that will provide cloud storage should be encouraged to be self-provisioning for water and electricity, while addressing carbon emission reductions to mitigate against environmental degradation, and that they must not be in areas prone to natural disasters or social disturbances and have a minimum uptime of 99.995%.
Given SA’s unreliable public service provision, if such requirements are to be implemented incentive schemes or other mitigation measures might need to be considered. Alternatively, in the interest of cost efficiency there should be a graded approach to balance data urgency and accessibility. Even if SA’s public data were accessible to all, a downtime of a few hours to access the latest birth records would not be as detrimental to safety and prosperity as, say, the unavailability of the police’s information system.
The paper makes the mature admission that given the complexity and cost of building and operating a data centre, the government should leave this to the private sector and rent server space. This is a welcome approach and given the size of the private sector investment and taxpayer outlay an economic study would be welcome to understand the challenges and opportunities. Though there has been growing investment in local data centres, SA still lags other major emerging markets.
Cede property
The fifth proposal is that “the private sector also amasses substantial volumes of data through its transactional relationships with customers, which include citizens, organisations, institutions and other companies. When made available and used, this data can help derive insights that drive innovation, foster creativity in problem-solving and facilitate the development of new and tradable digital goods and services”.
A wary reading is that this statement is proposing that companies cede their intellectual property. There are of course questions about granularity: could a multinational corporation be compelled to share personal information on its clients to government? Beyond privacy concerns, that creates a risk for commercially sensitive information falling into the hands of competitors.
The government now collects data by virtue of statute, and data collection that disproportionately affects rights in comparison to the intended government purpose can be constitutionally challenged. The policy seems to suggest that private entities can be approached to offer up their private data, without any statutory authority. This is no technical quibble here, but it strikes at the heart of public data and its democratisation. The power to collect data should be taken seriously, and similarly the citizenry is entitled to access data they in effect pay for through their taxes.
An optimistic reading is that government wants to invite private entities into a larger data ecosystem — voluntarily. If that is the case more power to the department of communications & digital technologies. However, creating an enabling environment for responsible data sharing for public policy and commercial purposes would require far deeper discussion. The paper recognises the need for “open standards and open systems, including open-source frameworks”, but in fairness this statement of intent is a starting point for several more rounds of public consultation.
An effective framework to share government data is not a nice-to-have or developed country problem. The Global Data Barometer shows that SA is falling behind other emerging markets such as Rwanda, Uganda and Nigeria, in terms of use and sharing of government data. And a World Bank survey found that SA lacks “an enabling regulatory environment that promotes the use and reuse of public intent data”.
Maturing the data management infrastructure and practices in the public sector presents a tremendous challenge but must be a national strategic priority for SA to achieve the data-led future the national policy on data and cloud imagines.
• Steenkamp is CEO at Codera Analytics and a research associate at Stellenbosch University. Roos is an associate with Codera.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
PIETMAN ROOS AND DAAN STEENKAMP: Laudable national data and cloud policy will enhance landscape
On May 31 the department of communications & digital technologies published the national policy on data and cloud. It is mostly a coherent, sensible paper and the department deserves praise for policies that, if implemented, will improve the SA data landscape.
The new policy declares that government shall prioritise cloud services as the primary option for new ICT procurement. This will be a boon for the local data centre and cloud services industry.
The paper invites stakeholders to give feedback by July. There are five salient policy proposals that are not only worth further consideration, but are in fact worthy of their own policy papers. This is not a critique of the paper, but rather a reflection of the complexity of the subject.
The paper recognises that government collects vast amounts of data on its citizens in various formats, but more could be done to digitise data assets. For example, some information may be stored in hard copy paper format and other information is stored digitally. That causes inefficiencies, data gaps and potential for data loss. Ask anyone who has ever lost a marriage certificate.
The policy recognises the need for harmonisation of technical standards across government entities and the need for common data governance mechanisms to enable data integration and system interoperability. But the challenge is immense. Only limited data is available in machine-readable format, limiting data sharing not just among government entities but also with the private sector. This will require a deployment of technically skilled officials within the State Information Technology Agency and each government department, to such an extent that short-term advisers will be a necessity to fill the gap.
Self-provisioning
The paper advocates evidenced-based policy on the back of improved data sharing between government departments. Again, this is a wonderful idea but sceptics (and policy nerds) might recall that in the late 2000s the government committed to introduce Regulatory Impact Assessments (RIAs) as part of legislative proposals. As RIAs are unfortunately not part of SA’s policy development framework, the lofty ambition to have evidence-based policy is likely to suffer the same fate unless there is a fundamental change in approach.
The paper suggests that physical data centres that will provide cloud storage should be encouraged to be self-provisioning for water and electricity, while addressing carbon emission reductions to mitigate against environmental degradation, and that they must not be in areas prone to natural disasters or social disturbances and have a minimum uptime of 99.995%.
Given SA’s unreliable public service provision, if such requirements are to be implemented incentive schemes or other mitigation measures might need to be considered. Alternatively, in the interest of cost efficiency there should be a graded approach to balance data urgency and accessibility. Even if SA’s public data were accessible to all, a downtime of a few hours to access the latest birth records would not be as detrimental to safety and prosperity as, say, the unavailability of the police’s information system.
The paper makes the mature admission that given the complexity and cost of building and operating a data centre, the government should leave this to the private sector and rent server space. This is a welcome approach and given the size of the private sector investment and taxpayer outlay an economic study would be welcome to understand the challenges and opportunities. Though there has been growing investment in local data centres, SA still lags other major emerging markets.
Cede property
The fifth proposal is that “the private sector also amasses substantial volumes of data through its transactional relationships with customers, which include citizens, organisations, institutions and other companies. When made available and used, this data can help derive insights that drive innovation, foster creativity in problem-solving and facilitate the development of new and tradable digital goods and services”.
A wary reading is that this statement is proposing that companies cede their intellectual property. There are of course questions about granularity: could a multinational corporation be compelled to share personal information on its clients to government? Beyond privacy concerns, that creates a risk for commercially sensitive information falling into the hands of competitors.
The government now collects data by virtue of statute, and data collection that disproportionately affects rights in comparison to the intended government purpose can be constitutionally challenged. The policy seems to suggest that private entities can be approached to offer up their private data, without any statutory authority. This is no technical quibble here, but it strikes at the heart of public data and its democratisation. The power to collect data should be taken seriously, and similarly the citizenry is entitled to access data they in effect pay for through their taxes.
An optimistic reading is that government wants to invite private entities into a larger data ecosystem — voluntarily. If that is the case more power to the department of communications & digital technologies. However, creating an enabling environment for responsible data sharing for public policy and commercial purposes would require far deeper discussion. The paper recognises the need for “open standards and open systems, including open-source frameworks”, but in fairness this statement of intent is a starting point for several more rounds of public consultation.
An effective framework to share government data is not a nice-to-have or developed country problem. The Global Data Barometer shows that SA is falling behind other emerging markets such as Rwanda, Uganda and Nigeria, in terms of use and sharing of government data. And a World Bank survey found that SA lacks “an enabling regulatory environment that promotes the use and reuse of public intent data”.
Maturing the data management infrastructure and practices in the public sector presents a tremendous challenge but must be a national strategic priority for SA to achieve the data-led future the national policy on data and cloud imagines.
• Steenkamp is CEO at Codera Analytics and a research associate at Stellenbosch University. Roos is an associate with Codera.
PIETMAN ROOS AND DAAN STEENKAMP: Changing landscape: how to regulate AI in finance
DAAN STEENKAMP AND PIETMAN ROOS: AI economists need to do more than blindly trust the machine
DAAN STEENKAMP AND PIETMAN ROOS: Let the market do its work and help supervise banks
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
ARTHUR GOLDSTUCK: Data repatriation: not all silver linings are in the cloud
JOHAN STEYN: SA’s new cloud policy could be a game-changer
JOHAN STEYN: SA’s AI plan presents both opportunities and hurdles
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.