NICO KATZKE: Simple but effective investing
The key to diversification is not holding many assets, but holding different types of assets
The virtues of not tying one’s fortunes to a single event have been known for centuries — as Shakespeare eloquently states in The Merchant of Venice: “My ventures are not in one bottom trusted ... Therefore, my merchandise makes me not sad.”
But there is more to diversification than simply being an effective sleep aid. Below are five important features of diversification to keep in mind when investing.
Most would say diversification simply means placing your eggs in different baskets. But if your eggs are in different baskets that are all on the same vehicle and that vehicle overturns, all your eggs might still be broken. This means the key to diversification is not simply holding many assets, but rather holding different types of assets.
An index that holds 1,000 equities might not be diversified at all if equity markets experience a co-ordinated downturn (as seen in 2008 and 2022). This makes carefully considered portfolio construction a key step in building long-term wealth. It is wise to keep in mind that N-diversification (holding many assets) is not the same as risk-diversification.
This might seem like a very strange statement, but similar to picking the best players for their positions in sport (and not just the 15 quickest or largest players), building a well-diversified portfolio may mean holding seemingly inferior assets too. These assets can offer important hedging features to your portfolio, shielding against large periodic losses.
Though equities offer significantly more upside over the long term than fixed income instruments, holding alternative assets with lower correlations ensures a smoother long-term investment journey. This feeds into the next point: avoiding downside is (far) more important than capturing upside.
A smoother return profile through diversification has both health and wealth benefits, specifically by helping manage downside risk. The impact of losses is far more severe than similar gains. The graph shows initial price moves on the X-axis, and the subsequent required moves to get back to parity. Notice how steep the required gains are following losses (left) compared to required losses following gains (right).
This means losing 60% requires a gain of 150% to get back to parity, while a gain of 60% is fully offset by a mere loss of 37.5%. The cumulative effect of large losses is therefore felt for long periods, something investors may not fully appreciate.
This feeds into the next point: entry and exit points matter. Timing entry and exit points can be a precarious exercise. To show this we plot the peak-to-trough variation for listed local stocks (split between large-, mid- and small caps) per year. The coloured box shows the 20th and 80th percentiles, with the horizontal line in the middle being the average. From this we see that individual share prices on the FTSE/JSE All Share Index commonly deviate 30%-40% per year.
This means even if you take a correct long-term view on a company, the timing of entry and exit points matter greatly. This makes the act of stock picking, by both individuals and even professional fund managers, a high-risk strategy. Contrast this to investing in a simple vanilla index such as the FTSE/JSE Capped SWIX Index, which is made up of a diversified combination of listed stocks.
The index typically deviates 10%-15%, meaning the timing of entry and exit points matters less than when trading individual stocks. And as stressed above, avoiding large swings is important for long-term wealth creation.
As the benefits of diversification are not directly observed, its value in your wealth creation journey is often underappreciated. This means we have to consciously accept the virtues of a diversified approach to building wealth. But this is easier said than done.
We are often confronted by stories of great investment decisions, such as that friend at a braai reminding you about her recommendation to buy that stock at the beginning of the year that is now 90% up; or the uncle who told you to buy Sasol at R25 per share; or the relative that suggested buying Bitcoin when it dipped.
We then instinctively do mental accounting and get frustrated at missing out on those opportunities — painfully aware of the comparatively pedestrian returns our long-term diversified strategies delivered over that period. Unfortunately, the desire to share poor investment decisions as cautionary tales is not as strong, so we receive a misrepresentation of the reality of taking concentrated bets.
But hindsight is a fiendish mistress, and it is tempting to grow impatient and act to chase the next big payoff opportunity. In those times of great temptation it may be wise to remind yourself of the short poem by Ambrose Bierce, A Lacking Factor: “You acted unwisely,” I cried, “as you can see by the outcome!” He calmly eyed me: “When choosing the course of my action... I had not the outcome to guide me.”
The simple insight offered is to never judge decisions based on uncertain outcomes, as it may teach us bad lessons. We should instead focus on that which we can control: avoiding concentrated risks and the large swings (positive and negative) it entails. Fortunately, indexation vehicles can be easily accessed through exchanged-traded funds, vehicles where diversification is a built-in feature.
It should also be sought through holding diverse asset classes and seeking intermediated help in building a portfolio that can withstand periods of instability. Thereafter it becomes a psychological game of fighting the urge to change course and chase the high returns that look so easy after the fact.
After all, a diversified approach can be thankless and not very exciting, with few highlights. But it sure has gold at the end of the road.
• Katzke is head of portfolio solutions at Satrix, a division of Sanlam Investment Management.
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.