subscribe Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Subscribe now
Picture: BLOOMBERG/KIYOSHI OTA
Picture: BLOOMBERG/KIYOSHI OTA

Crude oil is one of the most important, if not the single most important raw material input to all industrial activity. But even though analysts have more than 150 years of international trade to go on, they are still divided on what the price of oil should be.

One group of analysts (including Facts Global Energy and Rystadt Energy) say that crude oil prices will recover again to reach almost $100/barrel by the end of the year. Another equally credible group of analysts (including JPMorgan and the US Energy Information Administration) do not expect the oil price to break through the $80 mark.

For seven decades, global oil supply — and, as a result, oil prices — has, to a large extent, been controlled by the Opec group. The 13-member alliance controls about 30% of global oil production and, crucially, owns a massive 80% of oil reserves.

The price of Brent crude oil has been a roller coaster for the past three years. The Russian invasion of Ukraine in February last year sent it rocketing to an intraday high of $130/barrel, only to come crashing back down to the low $70s territory. Then there was the brief dip in future oil contracts below $0 in April 2020 as demand collapsed during the pandemic.

This fluctuating price is not ideal for countries with budgets relying entirely  on the oil price. So Opec adjusts supply within reason when they feel the price is too low. The group made significant production cuts in October 2022 and April and June this year. Opec+ also announced a reduction in production by another 1.4-million barrels per day starting next year. The International Energy Agency (IEA) voiced concern about the potential impact on production costs on a market that was already set to be tight in the second half of 2023.

Global oil demand is roughly 100-million barrels a day so, in total, these cuts add up to almost 6% of global supply.

Russian oil, vital in financing its war effort, has continued to find a way into the market, mainly via Asian buyers. Kpler Research data indicates that Chinese imports of Russian crude averaged 1.59-million barrels a day in March 2023, up 68% from 2022’s matching period. The result is that prices have perhaps not reacted as quickly as Opec would have liked, but at some point, they must. Once recessionary fears abate and when (if) Chinese manufacturing numbers finally ramp up, the normal economic principle of demand outweighing supply, leading to rising prices, must prevail.

Clearly the market expects the demand-supply imbalance to flow through to price at some stage, but trying to time this is a difficult task. One factor alone — the duration of the Russian war — could affect this timeline by months, if not years. Thus, trying to pinpoint the price of crude in six months from now is a futile exercise.

Given our reliance on Opec oil in the near term (that is the next decade), the price of oil is likely to gravitate towards whatever Saudi Arabia, as Opec’s producer-in-chief, needs it to be because its fiscus depends largely on oil revenue. Consensus is that the kingdom needs the price of Brent crude to be more than $80/barrel to cover the government’s spending bill, but this number is hard to verify.

The longer term (decade plus) equation is even murkier, and will, to a large extent, depend on how successful countries are in achieving their long-term sustainability goals and whether there is sufficient oil production to meet demand.

While there is no shortage of commitments from major governments and corporates around the world to shifting to renewables, executing on all of these is another story. The IEA has identified three different scenarios for future energy usage, based on how effectively these commitments are met. Their base scenario sees global oil demand still forecast to rise by 3.5-million barrels a day by 2025 in contrast to the 3-million barrels a day fall needed to meet the World Energy Outlook’s sustainable development scenario.

On the other side of the equation, supply will be affected by the underinvestment in future crude oil production, as Western oil conglomerates have faced increased pressure from activist shareholders to clamp down on any new nonrenewable’s capex. This has not had a major effect on the profits of the big oil conglomerates, which actually benefited from capex spend being slashed. It has, however, had a clear effect on downstream oil services companies, such as Schlumberger, Halliburton and Baker Hughes whose profits have collapsed as they are tied to oil exploration.

While short term oil prices are largely a function of Opec’s decision to open or close the taps, in the long term market fundamentals will come to the fore. These are likely to be favourable as a result of sticky demand and a decade-long underinvestment in oil exploration, which is only now beginning to correct itself.

Oil services companies, which are a geared to play on a rebound in oil capex spending, stand to benefit disproportionately from this trend.

• Hayward is an equity analyst at Flagship Asset Management.

subscribe Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Subscribe now

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.