LETTER: Retaining Cyril Ramaphosa as president condemns SA to incompetence
Even Ramaphosa must now recognise that he is totally incapable of providing the inspirational leadership our country needs
07 March 2023 - 16:58
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
During his tenure as president, Cyril Ramaphosa has led us inexorably from his promised “New Dawn” to a state of national darkness and despair.
His long awaited “reconfiguration of the executive” has turned out to be a keeping-up-appearances exercise, and has again exposed just how firmly stuck he is between the proverbial rock and a hard place, and why his own presidential light should be extinguished once and for all.
His personal constitutional prerogative — not the ANC’s or anyone else’s — in this matter could have been an opportunity to show South Africans that he is truly and solely in charge of choosing an executive of independent excellence, integrity, experience and competence, but it is clear that his choice of cabinet was overwhelmed by the wishes and wants of the various ANC, SACP and Cosatu factions, internal underhand party manipulations and bargaining, and personal fears about a challenge to his own presidential status. There is clearly no concern for the future wellbeing of our nation.
That those responsible for our failed state of energy provision, public enterprises, policing, education and health remain in charge of their portfolios immune from accountability or sanction beggars belief.
Even Ramaphosa must now recognise that he is totally incapable of providing the strong, fearless, inspirational leadership our country needs, and that if he does not willingly step aside his legacy, and that of his cabinet appointees, will lie increasingly in tatters. And so will our nation’s prospects of stability, growth and wellbeing.
His conflict between loyalty to his crisis-ridden party and responsibility to the nation at large, the growing implications of malfeasance and dubious financial dealings in the Phala Phala matter, his inability to reject internationally controversial and suspect relationships with Russia and China, his neglect of and indifference to time deadlines to sign bills and make statutory appointments, his fear of dismissing patently failed members of his cabinet, and his wilful blindness to cadre corruption and incompetence, render him devoid of credibility, totally unfit for purpose and an obstacle to progress, peace and prosperity for our country.
While we may fret over the stark absence of a capable and untainted successor from within the ANC — there are none, least of all his deputy — retaining Ramaphosa as president simply condemns our country to a state of continued indecision, stagnation, lawlessness, incompetence and endemic fraud and corruption.
Willingly or unwillingly, be it by way of recall, resignation, retirement, stepping down or stepping aside, he should go.
David Gant Kenilworth
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
LETTER: Retaining Cyril Ramaphosa as president condemns SA to incompetence
Even Ramaphosa must now recognise that he is totally incapable of providing the inspirational leadership our country needs
During his tenure as president, Cyril Ramaphosa has led us inexorably from his promised “New Dawn” to a state of national darkness and despair.
His long awaited “reconfiguration of the executive” has turned out to be a keeping-up-appearances exercise, and has again exposed just how firmly stuck he is between the proverbial rock and a hard place, and why his own presidential light should be extinguished once and for all.
His personal constitutional prerogative — not the ANC’s or anyone else’s — in this matter could have been an opportunity to show South Africans that he is truly and solely in charge of choosing an executive of independent excellence, integrity, experience and competence, but it is clear that his choice of cabinet was overwhelmed by the wishes and wants of the various ANC, SACP and Cosatu factions, internal underhand party manipulations and bargaining, and personal fears about a challenge to his own presidential status. There is clearly no concern for the future wellbeing of our nation.
That those responsible for our failed state of energy provision, public enterprises, policing, education and health remain in charge of their portfolios immune from accountability or sanction beggars belief.
Even Ramaphosa must now recognise that he is totally incapable of providing the strong, fearless, inspirational leadership our country needs, and that if he does not willingly step aside his legacy, and that of his cabinet appointees, will lie increasingly in tatters. And so will our nation’s prospects of stability, growth and wellbeing.
His conflict between loyalty to his crisis-ridden party and responsibility to the nation at large, the growing implications of malfeasance and dubious financial dealings in the Phala Phala matter, his inability to reject internationally controversial and suspect relationships with Russia and China, his neglect of and indifference to time deadlines to sign bills and make statutory appointments, his fear of dismissing patently failed members of his cabinet, and his wilful blindness to cadre corruption and incompetence, render him devoid of credibility, totally unfit for purpose and an obstacle to progress, peace and prosperity for our country.
While we may fret over the stark absence of a capable and untainted successor from within the ANC — there are none, least of all his deputy — retaining Ramaphosa as president simply condemns our country to a state of continued indecision, stagnation, lawlessness, incompetence and endemic fraud and corruption.
Willingly or unwillingly, be it by way of recall, resignation, retirement, stepping down or stepping aside, he should go.
David Gant
Kenilworth
JOIN THE DISCUSSION: Send us an email with your comments to letters@businesslive.co.za. Letters of more than 300 words will be edited for length. Anonymous correspondence will not be published. Writers should include a daytime telephone number.
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
LETTER: Properties are valued in cloud cuckoo land
LETTER: Race quotas caused Eskom meltdown
LETTER: SA’s water management needs to be in the hands of professionals
LETTER: Complexity of simple questions for banks’ bots show up AI
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.