×

We've got news for you.

Register on BusinessLIVE at no cost to receive newsletters, read exclusive articles & more.
Register now
IEC commissioners brief the media at its results centre in Pretoria. Picture: MASI LOSI
IEC commissioners brief the media at its results centre in Pretoria. Picture: MASI LOSI

​​​Now that the local government elections are over, the focus is on the potential coalitions.

In many municipalities, including five of the metropolitan municipalities, no party was able to achieve more than 50%, thus triggering intense and potentially heated negotiations over possible coalition governments.

With the DA already having said it will not go into a coalition with the ANC or EFF, it is possible that some municipalities will be unable to conclude coalition agreements necessary to ensure proper governance.

Yet coalitions are entirely unnecessary. The Local Government: Municipal Structures Act provides for two types of government at a municipal level.  The ultimate decision as to which type of government is used is made by the provincial minister responsible for local government.

The first system of government — the executive mayoral system — is the one that has been employed by almost all municipalities across the country over the past couple of decades. With this system, the executive mayor is extremely powerful. In many ways, they have more power at a local level than a premier has at provincial level, or the president has at national level. It is thus a winner-take-all system. Accordingly, when it comes to coalition negotiations, a huge amount of debate will need to take place as to who will serve as the executive mayor and how the executive mayor’s powers will be constrained to take into consideration the other parties in the coalition. 

The executive mayoral system has proved to be highly politicised, with numerous municipalities focusing more on issues of political debate and conflict than on their obligation to engage in service delivery, particularly with regard to electricity, water, waste and, to a certain extent, housing. 

The act offers an alternative system of government that is far more geared towards service delivery and co-operation between political parties. This is the collective executive system. In terms of this system, the mayor is not an executive mayor and largely plays a ceremonial role. Power does not lie in the hands of the mayor, but in the hands of the executive committee.

The act provides that the executive committee must be composed in such a way that parties and interests represented in the council are proportionally represented in the executive committee. A council can decide on an alternative mechanism, but that mechanism must still comply with the requirements in section 160(8) of the constitution, which stipulates that the different parties must be “fairly represented” on the executive committee. 

The collective executive system will inevitably trigger a more co-operative approach when it comes to issues of service delivery. All the major parties in a council will be represented on the executive committee. They will meet regularly and be forced to work together. That assists in depoliticising the council and allowing the collective leadership to focus on service delivery, which should be an uncontentious agenda for all parties. In hung councils, there will no longer be a governing party and opposition benches because the main parties will all be represented in the leadership structure.

If the collective executive system is adopted, it will then be unnecessary for political parties to enter into complex and contested coalition agreements. Thus, for example, if one party got 40% of the vote, another 30%, another 20%, and another 10%, a 10-person executive committee would be represented on a 4, 3 ,2, 1 basis by those leading parties (assuming they adopt a strict proportional model). It will also lessen the influence of those small parties that got limited support in the election, but which can become kingmakers in coalition negotiations.

Municipalities and provincial governments should give careful consideration to shifting from an executive mayoral to a collective executive system. No change in law is required. It simply requires a determination by the provincial ministers responsible for local government.

• Evans is with Webber Wentzel

subscribe

Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

Commenting is subject to our house rules.