Coal-fired power stations can be repurposed for cleaner use
This has been done in Australia, and is much more effective than decommissioning, write Wayne Glossop and Tord Johnsson
All over the world utilities are facing the problem of what to do with obsolete and inefficient power stations. In the SA context, most were built in the 1960s and 1970s, when the predominant technology was coal. In the 21st century, as the focus is converting to a low-carbon economy, coal technology cannot be rejuvenated. But these sites can be adapted to become modern, multi-use facilities.
Shutting old coal-fired power stations, demolishing them and sterilising the site has a number of undesirable effects, including significant environmental liabilities, socioeconomic hardship and the stranding of transmission infrastructure that still has value but is impracticable to move. A far better solution to decommissioning is coal “repurposing”, which aligns with the principles of reuse and recycle in the circular economy.
According to the US Energy Information Administration, 121 coal-fired power plants in the US were repurposed between 2011 and 2019 to burn different fuels, usually gas. The most appropriate power stations for conversion are those with smaller capacity that are more than 50 years old.
A good example of how this can be done is our recent project for AGL Energy at Barker Inlet Power Station in South Australia. This involved taking an old and inefficient 480MW thermal power plant and replacing its obsolete equipment with new dual-fuel reciprocating engines, capable of running on either natural gas or synthetic gas or liquid fuel. The repurposed power station is able to generate 211MW of fast-start and high-efficiency gas power to balance variable generation from renewable sources. AGL Energy has also selected Wärtsilä as a preferred supplier for up to 1GW of battery energy storage systems.
As SA moves towards a greater reliance on renewable energy sources and starts to close its older power stations, its need for dispatchable power to balance the grid can be linked to the repurposing of those sites. Their special attraction is that they already have some of the necessary environmental permits in place and are well-situated for access to transport links and transmission infrastructure.
We envisage that some of those power generation sites could become gas power plants, possibly combined with batter storage, as we have demonstrated at Barker Inlet. Some of the renewable energy developers could be interested in co-locating their solar PV or wind facilities near to these plants to utilise some of the infrastructure, particularly the grid connection.
Beyond power generation, the sites could also become smart technology hubs. They could offer training centres to pass on the operational and maintenance skills required for these technologies, of which Eskom has limited experience. They could also incorporate testing and research facilities into future fuel sources. The green power from this facility could be used to fuel a hydrogen production plant, and the hydrogen could be (initially) combined with natural gas to generate greener energy until such time that the technology is mature enough to rely solely on hydrogen. These sites could benefit from co-location, co-creation and sharing assets among private and public companies and academia.
Sourcing the gas for these power plants is naturally a critical element to consider, but thankfully there are positive developments in this regard. Most of the Eskom power stations earmarked for repurposing are near or within reach of extensions to the existing gas pipeline from the Pande and Temane fields in Mozambique. It has been well reported that these gas fields are nearing the end of their life, but plans are under way to supplement that gas through liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports via either Maputo or Richards Bay. The final solution should emerge in the near future as either Mozambique starts to execute its LNG export project or SA’s gas-to-power programme accelerates.
Some of the issues to be considered are that the environmental impact assessment and generation licence for each site will have to be reviewed and updated. These issues can be resolved relatively quickly, with the support of government departments including environment, forestry & fisheries, trade, industry & competition, mineral resources & energy and public enterprises, all of which have an interest in finding a solution. The full backing of Eskom is also needed to make these projects a success, and Eskom has given positive signals in this regard.
Eskom is understood to be preparing the first requests for proposals for the decommissioned power plants and these should be released in the next few months. However, an important outstanding aspect of repurposing the old coal-fired plants is which party will assume responsibility for setting aside the necessary funding guarantees for remediation of legacy environmental damage. An overly complex approach to these liabilities is likely to deter investors and cause unnecessary delays. We expect this will be made clear in the requests for proposals.
Our experience in Australia has shown that converting a thermal power station to flexible gas and/or battery storage can ensure the reliability of renewable power in the grid, provide cost savings and reduce CO₂ emissions.
• Glossop is business development manager Southern Africa, and Johnsson GM strategic relations & business South & East Africa, with Wärtsilä Energy.
Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.