Bureaucracy is standing in the way of economic growth
Seismic shifts are required in terms of government ideology to implement the necessary structural reforms
Despite better-than-expected tax collections in the 2020/2021 financial year, SA’s expenditure continues to exceed revenue collections nudging the economy ever closer to the fiscal cliff.
Despite claims from finance minister Tito Mboweni that the 2021 budget is not an austerity budget, budget cuts and shifts appear to be the order of the day, which should not be surprising given that the country has just experienced its largest tax shortfall on record.
The finance minister said the government expects to collect R1.21-trillion in taxes in the 2020/2021 year — about R213bn less than its 2020 budget expectations — and that it expects to collect R1.37-trillion in the 2021/2022 year. This latter figure, however, assumes economic growth of 3.3%, after a 7.2% contraction in 2020.
Of significant concern is SA’s rapidly rising debt challenge. Debt increases from R3.95-trillion in the current financial year to R5.2-trillion in 2023/2024. Without a meaningful and significant commitment to structural reform the government is unlikely to consolidate, let alone lower, the country’s rapidly unsustainable debt levels.
Structural impediments, including a highly bureaucratic and heavily regulated environment, are making it increasingly difficult for the economy to achieve any meaningful level of growth.
While Mboweni talked about getting the country’s “fiscal house in order” and said he is “hopeful because we are making meaningful progress in the implementation of our structural economic reforms”, the evidence of this progress is limited.
Bureaucratic obstacles continue to hamper growth as is evidenced by, for example, the delay in the allocation of spectrum, policy uncertainty around property rights. and agreeing the principles of the mining charter including the once empowered, always empowered principle, among other things.
The government must urgently needs to abandon the idea that it needs to be involved at every level. This path has led to bureaucracy and inefficiency
The provision of reliable energy remains a major challenge. Although the government is making the right moves in terms of getting the private sector involved in the independent power producer (IPP) space, the pace is far slower than it should be.
Inefficient and badly managed state-owned enterprises (SOEs) will likely continue to make demands on the fiscus despite the Treasury’s insistence that it has put the brakes on further bailouts. The R7bn for Land Bank was therefore not unexpected. Until the government is able to put ideology aside and be decisive about unbundling or privatising SEOs, these will continue to be a drain on government finances.
A consequence of the government’s inability to implement structural reforms is a lack of confidence in the economy. Business confidence levels are at levels last seen in the mid-1980s.
The government’s R791.2bn commitment to the infrastructure drive is encouraging, but needs to be considered in the context of a poor track record as far as implementation is concerned. Despite a recognition of the value of infrastructure spend as a mechanism to kick-start sluggish economic growth, implementation continues to be too slow.
State funds continue to be diverted away from long-term capacity building expenditure and is instead being refocused on consumption expenditure. The consequences of this exacerbates our growing unemployment problem, which is at a record high of 32.5%.
The government urgently needs to move decisively on issues such as power supply, policy certainty, property rights, deregulation, privatisation and labour market reform if it hopes to encourage private-sector investment. Furthermore it needs to address the current debt trajectory if it hopes to avoid further credit ratings downgrades.
It is becoming increasingly apparent that the bond market does not believe the country can manage its debt profile. Consider, for example, that SA 10-year bonds have historically traded at about a 1.5% premium to emerging-market peers. Now, this is at more than 4%.
The reality is that seismic shifts are required in terms of government ideology to implement the necessary structural reforms required to return the economy to a growth path. The government must urgently abandon the idea that it needs to be involved at every level. This path has led to bureaucracy and inefficiency.
Despite the proposed expenditure cuts, the reality is that, on their own, they are not sufficient to fundamentally change the trajectory of SA’s debt profile. Until such time as the government deals with these structural issues, we will not have sufficient growth to increase the tax base and revenue. And without this growth we will be headed for a sovereign debt crisis within the next four to five years.
We no longer have the luxury of time.
• Duvenage is MD of NFB Private Wealth Management.
Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.