Picture: RAZIHUSIN/123RF
Picture: RAZIHUSIN/123RF

The SA Revenue Service’s (Sars’s) revised June 2020 estimate for tax collections for the 2020/2021 financial year was R234bn (or 17%) less than the previous financial year.

Sars commissioner Edward Kieswetter said improved tax collection and administration “continues to be an important element in achieving fiscal consolidation as Sars continues to rebuild its capacity. As an organisation, our near-term objectives include … finalising the tax gap study ... to quantify the difference between how much tax should be collected and how much is collected.”

When the Sars Large Business Centre was re-established in 2018, one of its objectives was to focus on wealthy individuals as a “target segment”. To Sars, these are individuals whose gross income exceeds R7m a year and/or whose gross wealth exceeds R75m.

One of the historic difficulties for Sars has been to identify high-net-worth individuals and ascertain all the relevant details of their assets and structures. However, in recent years the tax disclosure landscape has been radically altered.

One of the game-changers has been the common reporting standards. This is an Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development initiative that introduced a standardised model for the automatic exchange of information, to allow participating jurisdictions to share information about their tax residents. SA agreed to exchange information in terms of this initiative in 2017. The US equivalent is the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act.

In addition, in terms of the Tax Administration Act of 2011, Sars may request or provide information to foreign governments under double tax agreements or other multilateral or bilateral information exchange agreements.

The automatic exchange of information involves the systematic and periodic transmission of taxpayer information between countries for various categories of income. Information concerning the acquisition of significant assets may be used to evaluate the net worth of an individual. As a result, the tax authority of a taxpayer’s country of residence can check its tax records to verify that taxpayers have accurately reported their foreign-sourced income or assets. Sars receives information on SA taxpayers from 87 jurisdictions in terms of the automatic exchange.

As if this wasn’t enough, the individual tax return also requires information from taxpayers regarding their foreign investments and structures, such as offshore trusts. For example, the tax return requires a taxpayer to provide information regarding capital contributions or loans used to fund offshore trusts as well as information regarding distributions from such trusts to SA-resident taxpayers.

Sars has recently started issuing letters to wealthy individuals, typically based on information collected under the automatic exchange of information from various offshore jurisdictions. These letters usually cover a number of tax years.

Matters of interest to Sars may include information from the taxpayer regarding confirmation of their offshore holdings, where the relevant funds are held, details of who facilitated the investments for the taxpayer, the source of funds used to acquire these assets and income derived from the assets. In addition, Sars may be interested in information regarding compliance with the taxpayer’s relevant tax obligations in relation to such investments or structures.

While prescription means Sars cannot issue additional assessments more than three years after the original assessment, this does not apply if there has been fraud, misrepresentation or nondisclosure of material facts by the taxpayer. In those circumstances, Sars can go back beyond the three-year period.

One of the most popular vehicles used by high-net-worth individuals are offshore trusts. Trusts have long formed part of SA law and are internationally recognised as legitimate vehicles for holding assets. However, tax authorities around the world have been irked by nondisclosure of offshore trusts. Previously, if an offshore trust was funded by a third party, no SA trustees were appointed and no distributions were made to SA tax residents, Sars may not have been aware of the existence of the offshore trust. However, in the new world of tax disclosure outlined above, offshore trusts are very much on the Sars radar.

Provided there has been compliance with all the relevant and complex tax rules regarding offshore trusts, no adverse tax consequences should arise. However, if there has been any level of non-compliance, the relevant taxpayer should expect a questionnaire from Sars followed by an audit process ultimately resulting in an additional assessment that could include interest and potentially significant penalties.

The days of wealthy taxpayers’ tax compliance status not being fully tested by Sars are well and truly over.

• Dachs is head of ENSafrica’s tax department. He writes in his personal capacity.


Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.