5G did not effect the virus, but the virus will affect 5G
5G rollout is inevitably delayed by the pandemic, but countries and companies can’t afford to take their eye of this new-tech ball
Do you remember 5G? Before the coronavirus consumed all our attention, the fifth-generation mobile networks were supposed to be the panacea for lagging economies, telecoms firms, keeping pace with China, autonomous cars, smart factories and plenty more besides.
Over-hyped? Maybe. But 5G will still be an economic boon. And, perhaps inevitably, Covid-19 has collided with the rollout of the new technology, which ultimately depends on four ingredients: popular acceptance and adoption; the ability to install the equipment; access to capital; and the availability of spectrum — the radio frequencies used to transmit the signal that will allow vast gobs of data to be transmitted at lightning speeds.
For now, telecoms companies insist the pandemic will only delay the rollout by several months. That may be optimistic. Problems with any one of the four factors above could throw things off course, and the current environment has elevated that likelihood. Given their role in dividing up the spectrum and auctioning it, governments have a particular responsibility to ensure they don’t hold up the process any more than is necessary.
Much has been made of the conspiracy theories falsely suggesting 5G contributed to, or even caused, the coronavirus’s spread. They prompted the gloriously terse response from the UK’s telecommunications regulator Ofcom: “This is wrong. There is no scientific basis or credible evidence for these claims.”
The falsehoods may still permeate public opinion. Research suggests that even if people don’t believe conspiracy theories per se, they can nonetheless influence their views. So an underlying fear, however unwarranted, could persist that 5G is somehow detrimental to one’s health. That could perpetuate popular opposition to the necessary proliferation of new antennae.
The virus has already disrupted the global supply chain, making it harder to source gear from China in particular. Telecoms equipment maker Nokia said that such interruptions shaved €200m from revenue in the first quarter, and they continue to be a risk. Lockdowns are also making it harder to install that equipment. Orange CFO Ramon Fernandez said last week that fibre deployment — which has wires that connect not just homes but the antennae — will be delayed by the virus.
Perhaps the biggest risk to a fast rollout is therefore the availability of spectrum, which is where governments come in
Telecoms operators are changing how they spend their money, too. The surge in people working from home has put huge pressure on their existing set-up.
That means operators are having to reallocate capital in the short term towards making sure their fixed networks are reliable, rather than working to upgrade and install everything that’s needed for the next generation of mobile services.
Even with all that, the delay is only likely to be a “couple of months”, Nokia CEO Rajeev Suri told me, echoing comments from his peer at rival Ericsson, Börje Ekholm. Perhaps the biggest risk to a fast rollout is therefore the availability of spectrum, which is where governments come in.
They dedicate a particular tranche of frequencies to 5G then auction it off. A slew of those sales have been put on the back burner by the pandemic. While Germany and Italy have all but finished theirs, a bevy of other countries, including France, the UK and Spain, are unlikely to auction frequencies until later this year.
With national budgets increasingly stretched by efforts to counter the economic effect of the virus, there will be a temptation to milk those auctions for all they’re worth. That could create a pinch on companies’ finances that makes rolling out the new networks even harder. Italy managed to squeeze €6. bn out of its telecoms firms back in 2018; Germany wrung €6.6bn from Deutsche Telekom, Vodafone Group, Telefonica Deutschland and 1&1 Drillisch.
Before the crisis, France set the minimum spend for its 5G spectrum auction at €2.2bn — a hefty threshold below which it will not grant access to its airwaves. The UK has set a £1bn minimum for its second auction.
Economists generally classify networks as “productive” government investments, because they contribute positively to long-term economic output. They would be well advised to foster their new 5G networks by not overcharging for them. Otherwise they risk ceding more ground to China in the race for adoption. In return for more generous auction terms, it would be fair for governments to request an accelerated rollout pace. Operators will need cash not just for 5G, but network investment more broadly.
The virus is already reaping havoc with vast tracts of the economy. Best not to let it damage any more growth.
• This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Alex Webb is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Europe's technology, media and communications industries. He previously covered Apple and other technology companies for Bloomberg News in San Francisco.
Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.