UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson serves Christmas lunch to British troops stationed in Estonia on December 21 2019. Picture: GETTY IMAGES/STEFAN ROUSSEAU
UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson serves Christmas lunch to British troops stationed in Estonia on December 21 2019. Picture: GETTY IMAGES/STEFAN ROUSSEAU

Boris Johnson’s triumphant UK election victory makes Brexit a near certainty in January. For the City of London, Britain’s split from its biggest trading partner is a huge leap into the unknown; one that will test its cohesion like never before.

Banks, insurers and asset managers have spent billions preparing for their departure from the EU and have moved as much as £1-trillion in assets overseas since the Brexit referendum in 2016.

The threat of a disorderly departure from the bloc encouraged the UK finance industry to speak largely with one voice to try to avoid — or at least prepare for — that cataclysmic outcome. But now the no-deal Brexit threat has abated there are signs that this unity is cracking.

Some in the City would like Britain to take advantage of the split and forge its own regulatory path; others want it to hew closer to the EU to make the transition as smooth as possible.

With the Brexit process entering its most critical phase, the UK-EU trade deal, it’s far from ideal that divisions are starting to appear. About one-quarter of UK financial services’ £200bn of yearly revenue comes from EU-related business,according to government reports. So there’s a vast amount at stake here.

At the core of the debate is whether the UK will continue to conform to EU standards. Under Johnson’s current agreement with Brussels, British financiers will, in 2021, lose their EU “passporting” rights (which allow them to work anywhere in the bloc). The UK and the EU have agreed instead on the principle of “equivalence”, which will give the City access to the EU for many  financial services as long as Britain adheres to Brussels rules.

The problem for some British financiers is that the EU can revoke equivalence at any time, leaving it with the whip hand. It has used this as a weapon to try to bring Switzerland into line on broader agreements around immigration and the like. Given the systemic importance of London’s financial markets, Brussels will demand even closer regulatory alignment than it asks of other trading partners.

That’s why many in the City would prefer to break entirely from the continent’s regulation, severing almost five decades of integration, a move that would see a low-tax, low-regulation Britain become a competitor to the single market. They point to London’s global strength as a reason not to fear an EU rupture: in one example, the UK’s share of forex trading — which turns over $6.6-trillion a day — has risen by six percentage points to 43% in three years, data compiled by the Bank for International Settlements shows. And that’s despite Brexit.

The Investment Association, representing the UK’s £9-trillion asset management and hedge fund industry favours an overhaul of the regulatory framework to prioritise the competitiveness of the UK over keeping the EU onside. But not all of the industry’s leaders agree. Many British insurers would also rather jettison EU-friendly capital rules, which they say penalise their businesses.

Meanwhile, Wall Street banks such as JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs provide lucrative services to the continent and have so far championed regulatory alignment. But if they have to operate two hubs in the UK and EU after Brexit anyway, then they too might be persuaded of the advantages of an unchained City of London.

While Johnson finally has a government team that’s united on Brexit, the same cannot be said for the City. Some disagreements on which way to go are happening within firms too. The danger is that this splintering means London might come away from the crucial trade negotiations with much less than it bargained for.

Bloomberg

Would you like to comment on this article or view other readers' comments?
Register (it’s quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.