subscribe Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Subscribe now
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Picture: REUTERS
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Picture: REUTERS

If Nato were any ordinary club, it wouldn’t hesitate to kick out one of its members: Turkey. The country has long been difficult; in 1974 it even fought against another member, Greece. But under President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Turkey has increasingly seemed less frenemy than outright foe. And yet Nato can’t simply push it out. That’s because Turkey might go nuclear, and not in a metaphorical sense.

The case for ejecting Turkey is certainly compelling. This week, as Nato leaders tried gamely to appear united after recent spats and divisions, Erdoğan blithely went the other way. He threatened to block a plan to better protect the Polish and Baltic allies from Russia, Nato’s most obvious enemy, because he wanted Nato, in return, to designate the Kurdish YPG militia as a terrorist group. The YPG was, until recently, an American ally in the fight against Islamic State (IS) in Syria, so that wasn’t going to happen.

In the end, Erdogan relented. Yet he seems to consider the Kremlin a partner more than a menace. He recently collaborated with Russian President Vladimir Putin in invading northern Syria, and has purchased a Russian air-defence system that could potentially spy on — or even sabotage — Nato’s other equipment, including US-made fighter planes.

And those are just the military aspects of a relationship that has become hostile all around. Turkey is also drilling for oil and gas in the Mediterranean, ignoring the objections of the EU, which has dibs on the same waters. And it is becoming less democratic by the day. Since an attempted coup in 2016, Erdoğan has turned unabashedly authoritarian, cracking down on the press, the courts and civil society.

Despite all these concerns, Nato must learn to live with Turkey, owing to two cold realities.

First, Erdoğan could actually make good on his threat to send migrants into Europe in numbers that exceed the populations of some EU countries. Turkey accommodates 3.7-million Syrian refugees. It could nudge them to cross to the Greek islands, as about 200,000 people did every month at the height of Europe’s migrant crisis in 2015.

One reason those crossings all but stopped the following year was that the two sides reached a deal: Turkey agreed to take back refugees that made it to Greece in return for lots of money and other help from the EU. Quitting that deal would hurt Turkey. But faced with the humiliation of being cast out of Nato, Erdoğan might decide that it’s worth it. The EU, meanwhile, has failed to reform its migrant system since 2015; it would enter another crisis.

A second and even greater peril is that Erdoğan would respond to expulsion by building his own nuclear weapons. He definitely wants them. The West says that Turkey “can’t have them”, he ranted in October. “This I cannot accept.”

Nuclear proliferation is one of the world’s most dire problems as it is. One arms-control treaty between the US and Russia (on “intermediate-range nuclear forces”) recently fell apart; the remaining one, called “New START” (strategic arms reduction treaty), seems destined to lapse in 2021. And as the nuclear non-proliferation treaty turns 50 next March, it looks increasingly toothless.

From North Korea to Iran, the wrong people have, or are capable of getting, the wrong weapons.

A Turkish bomb in the Middle East would therefore be a disaster. It would almost certainly lead to an arms race, as not only Iran but Saudi Arabia joined Israel in going nuclear. Superimposed on a map of conflicts that makes Europe in 1914 look simple, this is a recipe for Armageddon.

Nato can’t let that happen. Nor, of course, can it simply shrug off the political and military implications of a member state that might turn on its allies. It must draw up plans for new and scary scenarios. And it should move the nuclear weapons the US has currently stationed in Turkey, at its base in Incirlik, to Europe. This won’t solve the bigger problem. But it’s a necessary first step beyond denial.

• Kluth is a member of Bloomberg’s editorial board.

Bloomberg

subscribe Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
Subscribe now

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.