In this file photo taken on June 30, 2015 a logo is seen outside the headquarters of the International Monetary Fund in Washington, DC. Picture: BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI / AFP
In this file photo taken on June 30, 2015 a logo is seen outside the headquarters of the International Monetary Fund in Washington, DC. Picture: BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI / AFP

The justifiable expansion in government spending that immediately followed the 2007/2008 global financial crisis has been supplanted by a decade of loose fiscal policy and subpar macroeconomic growth. Before accounting for the inevitable realisation of Eskom’s contingent liabilities to the fiscus, SA’s “lost decade” has resulted in the doubling of government debt: from 26% in the 2008/2009 fiscal year to 57% (and counting) at present.

Against a backdrop of weak government finances, sickly economic growth and seemingly absent political will to effect growth-enhancing policy reform, there’s growing disquiet about the prospect of SA approaching the IMF for bailout financing. Two key questions need to be answered to determine whether these fears are well-founded:

  • Does SA fail a debt sustainability assessment?
  • Is SA’s capital market access at imminent risk?

First, central to determining the country’s debt sustainability over the medium term is an examination of the country’s debt profile and debt burden indicators.

To avoid a debt trap, what we ultimately need to form is a credible view that the primary budget surplus required to stabilise the country’s debt burden is attainable in the medium term. In this economic environment, a primary budget surplus in the medium term (forthcoming five years in IMF lexicon) will only realistically be achieved through average economic growth in excess of 2.6% over the next five years, assuming all else is equal; or cumulative expenditure containment of R150bn over the same period.

However, the domestic economy is simply inadequately geared to sustainably grow more than 2.6% in the medium term, so we can largely discount this as a credible solution to achieving debt sustainability.

Mercifully, in preparation for the 2020/2021 national budget, the Treasury has issued a compulsory budget baseline reduction of 5% in 2020/2021 fiscal year, 6% in 2021/2022 and 7% in 2022/2023 which, if adhered to by national departments and public institutions, can be read as an important first step away from the fiscal cliff.

Related to the assessment of the sovereign’s debt burden is its debt profile. Despite SA’s burgeoning funding requirement in the past decade, the financing thereof has been astute. The deficit has been predominantly financed through the issuance of long-dated nominal bonds. The Treasury has shied clear of its 20%-25% prudential limit to inflation-linked bond issuance and, most importantly, the “original sin” of foreign currency debt issuance has been well avoided, with a modest 5.5% of outstanding gross government debt denominated in foreign currency.

This is a crucial differentiator between SA and the basket of sovereign nations that have fallen off the fiscal cliff in the post-crisis era. The importance of low foreign currency debt issuance coupled with a free-floating exchange rate regime, which by design acts as an economic “shock absorber” that adjusts as and when appropriate to facilitate a balance of payments equilibrium, cannot be overstated.

To the second aforementioned question, the currency’s high beta nature relative to emerging-market peers is symbolic of the relative depth and ease of access of SA’s financial markets. Foreign investors’ access to SA’s financial markets is further illustrated by nonresident holdings of SA-issued government debt, which is currently at 37% of outstanding issuance. These foreign-ownership statistics measure fairly relative to emerging-market peers with comparatively deep, liquid financial markets.

Consequently, while SA’s economic outlook hasn’t looked gloomier in the post-democratic era, it is still too early for the ignominious calls for external debt relief from the IMF. Significant time has been wasted, trust eroded and economic damage caused in the past decade, but there remains a brief window of opportunity for policymakers to swallow the bitter pill that is fiscal probity and resolutely enact growth-enhancing structural reform. SA’s sovereignty depends on it.

• Rakale is research analyst, January interest rate market analyst and Mukansi portfolio manager, at Futuregrowth Asset Management.