Economic problems cannot be used as justification for Eskom retrenchments
The World Bank report is also misleading as it does not take into account SA's strategic skill and development needs, writes Khangela Baloyi
The only potential justification for possible retrenchments at Eskom is to accommodate independent power producers (IPPs). Retrenchment is defined as the dismissal of employees based on operational requirements. Section 213 of the Labour Relations Act defines operational requirements as economical, technological or structural needs of the company. Breaking down the three pillars of retrenchment can be a good test of whether retrenchments are justified. We cannot certainly use the economic challenges as a justification for retrenchments at Eskom. We haven’t had major economic challenges globally and locally that could lead to Eskom downscaling. It is a known fact that the South African economy is not growing, but we cannot use that as a reason to downsize Eskom. We need to project the future energy needs of the country and use that extrapolated data to make a decision on whether Eskom needs to be trimmed down. The SA economy must grow in order to meet the needs of the country’s 55-mi...
Would you like to comment on this article?
Register (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
BL Premium
This article is reserved for our subscribers.
A subscription helps you enjoy the best of our business content every day along with benefits such as articles from our international business news partners; ProfileData financial data; and digital access to the Sunday Times and Sunday Times Daily.
Already subscribed? Simply sign in below.
Questions or problems? Email helpdesk@businesslive.co.za or call 0860 52 52 00. Got a subscription voucher? Redeem it now