Stephan Hofstatter and Sikonathi Mantshantsha alleged in Business Day that Eskom could have saved R300m had it heeded advice not to pay the allegedly Gupta-linked firm Trillian, because of the irregularity and possible illegality of such payment. (Failure to heed advice cost Eskom R300m, September 1). When a friend shared the article with me, I opined that civil action should be taken against those involved to recover the money; R300m is an enormous amount of money. With Eskom being an organ of state, its loss is a public loss. Time and again, Eskom is being bailed out with public funds in addition to its frequent demands for electricity price hikes to raise revenue for its critical energy supply operations. Consider the amount of life-saving equipment that could be bought and maintained for public hospitals for R300m, and the number of lives, particularly of poor people, that could be saved as a result. Think about how this money could resolve the current cancer treatment crisis in...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.