Ostensible reassurances about the benefits of the introduction of "fair use" in South African copyright law need deeper scrutiny (Why fears about ‘fair use’ copyright law are unfounded, August 4). Like American University’s Sean Flynn, I spent the first week of August in Parliament’s public hearings on the Copyright Amendment Bill and my experience there of unfounded claims about "fair use" was quite different. Parliament was entertained with a recital of a poem quoting tiny excerpts from songs, with the claim that "fair use" was necessary so the poem would not infringe copyright. I and most, if not all, the other copyright lawyers in the room, were quite certain that it would not infringe copyright under the existing act. Much was made in Parliament and in the Google-sponsored workshop that preceded it, both addressed by Flynn, about the supposedly benefits of "fair use" for creative purposes. Far less attention was given to recent developments in US law on the application of "fair...

BL Premium

This article is reserved for our subscribers.

A subscription helps you enjoy the best of our business content every day along with benefits such as exclusive Financial Times articles, Morningstar financial data, and digital access to the Sunday Times and Times Select.

Already subscribed? Simply sign in below.



Questions or problems? Email helpdesk@businesslive.co.za or call 0860 52 52 00.