In early March, Gauteng held hearings on proposed amendments to the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA). This is the latest step in a procedurally flawed process — now in its fourth year — to formalise these amendments into law. In what is a hallmark of this legislative process, as well as the substance of the act and its amendments, the voice and consideration of mining-affected communities were almost entirely absent from the hearing. This is troubling, given that these are the people who bear the brunt of the health, environmental and socioeconomic impact of mining. President Jacob Zuma sent the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Amendment Bill back to Parliament in 2013, citing constitutional concerns. Parliament either rejected or tackled all but one of these issues: that the public-participation process preceding the bill was insufficient. In January, the Department of Mineral Resources — without consulting affected communities — then proposed an a...

BL Premium

This article is reserved for our subscribers.

A subscription helps you enjoy the best of our business content every day along with benefits such as exclusive Financial Times articles, Morningstar financial data, and digital access to the Sunday Times and Times Select.

Already subscribed? Simply sign in below.

Questions or problems? Email or call 0860 52 52 00.