The DA’s news conference earlier in November for the launch of its "position paper" on the Draft Liquor Amendment Bill struck several discordant notes. Most jarring was the banner: "Increasing drinking age makes it more difficult to prevent minors from drinking". This is not a well-informed position. A scan of the evidence shows that increasing the minimum drinking age to 21 years decreases drinking among 18 to 20-year-olds; reduces the number of high school dropouts, and increases protection from alcohol and other drug dependence, adverse birth outcomes, car crashes, suicide and murder. Making it more difficult to prevent minors from drinking is not one of the reported effects. The paper acknowledges the evidence: "studies prove that increasing the age limit results in the reduction of harm caused by alcohol abuse, notably in the targeted age group", but then adds "the reduction is often found to be disappointingly minor and short-term in nature, even in countries where enforcement...

Subscribe now to unlock this article.

Support BusinessLIVE’s award-winning journalism for R129 per month (digital access only).

There’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in SA. Our subscription packages now offer an ad-free experience for readers.

Cancel anytime.

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Speech Bubbles

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.