ID fraud may have happened when Adetshina was registered, says home affairs

The home affairs department says sufficient reasons exist to believe that fraud and identity theft may have been committed by the person recorded in the records as Chidimma Adetshina’s mother.

This is according to a statement from the department on Wednesday that provided an update on its investigation into the citizenship of Adetshina, a contestant in the upcoming Miss SA competition.

The department's preliminary findings also found Adetshina could not have participated in the alleged unlawful actions of her mother, as she was an infant at the time (2001).

“An innocent SA mother, whose identity may have been stolen as part of the alleged fraud committed by Adetshina’s mother, suffered as a result because she could not register her child,” the department said.

The department said it had broadened its investigation to identify and pursue any officials involved in the alleged fraudulent scheme, and was obtaining legal advice on the implications of the alleged fraudulent activity on Adetshina’s citizenship status.

“Upon completion of the investigation, home affairs intends to press criminal charges against all implicated parties.”

The department provided the update based on the official request received from the Miss SA organisation, as well as the consent provided by both the contestant and her mother.

“We will provide a final update once the investigation is concluded.”

On Monday, the organisers of the event sent the department a request to verify Adetshina’s citizenship.

“Upon receiving this request, the department deployed every resource at its disposal to establish the truth. This has included archival research, visits to hospitals and site visits to verify information.”

It said there were engagements with all stakeholders, including Adetshina’s mother.

“This case, which stems from alleged fraudulent activities committed 23 years ago, highlights the urgent need for the digital modernisation of home affairs applications, adjudication and verification processes to insulate the department against fraudulent interference, similar to the reforms undertaken at  Sars [SA Revenue Service] in the late 2000s.”

TimesLIVE