SA on track over climate targets if coal switch not delayed again, says energy plan head
The delay in taking power stations offline will only harm the commitment to net-zero emissions by 2050 if the plants continue to burn into the 2030s
27 February 2024 - 14:43
byTim Cocks
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
SA’s delay in taking coal-fired power stations offline will only harm its commitment to net-zero emissions by 2050 if the plants continue to burn well into the 2030s, the head of its donor-funded green energy plan said on Tuesday.
Officials admitted privately in November that SA will miss its binding 2030 carbon emissions targets under the Paris climate agreement, as Africa’s most industrialised country will run eight coal-fired power plants for longer than planned.
Countries worldwide, including Canada, Britain and Germany, have delayed or watered down energy transition plans.
SA is the world’s 15th-biggest emitter, according to the Global Carbon Atlas, a significant drop from previous years. This is mostly due to power shortages at state power provider Eskom. But its emissions are still much bigger than more developed economies such as Britain, Vietnam or Italy.
“If we delay well into the 2030s, we will have a problem in meeting our NDC [nationally determined contribution] commitments,” said Joanne Yawitch, head of the green energy overhaul, which Western and multilateral donors are partly funding.
“[But] I don’t think SA is backtracked from [its climate commitments] in any way whatsoever,” she added.
The country committed under the Paris deal to cut emissions to between 350 and 420-million tonnes annually by 2030, from 442-million tonnes this decade. To do this, it planned to decommission eight coal-fired power plants, six by 2030 and the remaining by 2034, but has since backed away from closing them.
The economy has been hit by brutal daily power shortages.
“Over the last couple of years, we have certainly been on track to be below reasonably below that 420 megatons of carbon equivalent [the 2030 goal],” Yawitch said, adding that “we haven’t had any indications that there is risk to the [donor] … financing” from delays to decommissioning coal plants.
Support our award-winning journalism. The Premium package (digital only) is R30 for the first month and thereafter you pay R129 p/m now ad-free for all subscribers.
SA on track over climate targets if coal switch not delayed again, says energy plan head
The delay in taking power stations offline will only harm the commitment to net-zero emissions by 2050 if the plants continue to burn into the 2030s
SA’s delay in taking coal-fired power stations offline will only harm its commitment to net-zero emissions by 2050 if the plants continue to burn well into the 2030s, the head of its donor-funded green energy plan said on Tuesday.
Officials admitted privately in November that SA will miss its binding 2030 carbon emissions targets under the Paris climate agreement, as Africa’s most industrialised country will run eight coal-fired power plants for longer than planned.
Countries worldwide, including Canada, Britain and Germany, have delayed or watered down energy transition plans.
SA is the world’s 15th-biggest emitter, according to the Global Carbon Atlas, a significant drop from previous years. This is mostly due to power shortages at state power provider Eskom. But its emissions are still much bigger than more developed economies such as Britain, Vietnam or Italy.
“If we delay well into the 2030s, we will have a problem in meeting our NDC [nationally determined contribution] commitments,” said Joanne Yawitch, head of the green energy overhaul, which Western and multilateral donors are partly funding.
“[But] I don’t think SA is backtracked from [its climate commitments] in any way whatsoever,” she added.
The country committed under the Paris deal to cut emissions to between 350 and 420-million tonnes annually by 2030, from 442-million tonnes this decade. To do this, it planned to decommission eight coal-fired power plants, six by 2030 and the remaining by 2034, but has since backed away from closing them.
The economy has been hit by brutal daily power shortages.
“Over the last couple of years, we have certainly been on track to be below reasonably below that 420 megatons of carbon equivalent [the 2030 goal],” Yawitch said, adding that “we haven’t had any indications that there is risk to the [donor] … financing” from delays to decommissioning coal plants.
Reuters
Patel backs local industry to create thriving green hydrogen plants
President’s climate advisers criticise energy plan
Creecy says climate fund will resemble Covid-19 relief fund
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most Read
Related Articles
President’s climate advisers criticise energy plan
Study lays out worrying effects of closing coal mines
TRACEY DAVIES: JET funding fuels concerns
Published by Arena Holdings and distributed with the Financial Mail on the last Thursday of every month except December and January.